i refuse to answer my own poll as well. this would be easy if I was a GM i suppose. id take cutler and put my personal differences aside. But since i dont have to, Ill choose neither.
Romo would be the best in the NFL if you could get him to value the football and not treat the game like it was being played in the sandlot. He makes just as many positive plays as anyone in the league does. But he also makes double the ridiculous-stupid mistakes that the average QB would make.
not riding the fence just not forced to choose. personally, i like romo more. however, if I was a gm Id take the more talented guy even though I hate him. that would be cutler. its akin to the TO situation. these gm's/owners always want the most talented guy regardless their history. daniel snyder is the worst. he manages the skins like its a fantasy team irrespective of team chemistry and relationships. that would be me im sure. cutler doesnt have much of a history although its clear i could never like him (unless he was a saint and won me a super bowl).
I'd take Romo over Cutler anyday and take my chances. Romo will most likely have a longer career not to mention Cutler is a head case and to top it all Cutler's agent could be a problem also. Another example was the Cutler vs Rivers confrontation.
