PPACA (Obama Care) Upheld by SCOTUS

You didn't ask for evidence, you said it was mathematically impossible.

It is not.

 

Still poor vocabulary.. Is it not??

 

Again, his job CZAR is the CEO of GE.

Do some reading

 

I have answered.

Your question is not simple, because taxes are not the only cause. To just raise taxes with no other means of UNDERSTANDING WHY jobs are overseas is stupidity.

How can I answer when the full extent of WHAT causes jobs overseas has not been studied?



For example, if the low taxes means some jobs goes overseas, what does higher taxes mean?

What is the cause and effect?

Maybe if you provide proof that higher taxes WILL bring jobs back I can give you my answer, but again, there are unanswered holes.

 

I know who is job czar is, man. But the guy isn't even a member of the administration, he is an advisor, a figure head at best. I don't like the fact that he outsourced jobs any more than Romney, but he is now working closely with the President to figure out ways to keep out jobs here and get some of the outsourced jobs back. Trying to compare a figure head advisor to Obama with Romney actually being the CEO and sole shareholder of Bain Capital is like comparing pecans to apples. Again, when did Obama ship jobs overseas?

 

No, it is not.

 

I have answered.

The question does not make sense because he cannot tell me what higher taxes will do. Until he does so, I cannot answer.

 

But shit, fuck, cunt, cocksucker mother fucker is?

These are only slang such as dick..

 

LOL he is working with Obama to figure out WHY he sends HIS jobs OVERSEAS?

Pecans to apples? You are right, Obama has been public sector all his life. What could he possibly know about jobs?

He has done it indirectly. I will not do the work for you.

 

My question is very straight forward and you are obviously not willing to answer it because you have danced all over the place in an effort not to answer me. Does it make sense to you that we keep giving subsidies and tax breaks to companies and individuals who are shipping jobs overseas. If they want to ship their companies and assets overseas then let them; it's a free country, but why keep giving them more tax breaks?

I am not asking for a dissertation on what causes jobs to be shipped overseas because everyone already knows why they are shipping their jobs overseas: it's because they can eke out an extra 5%-7% in net profit. There is no correlation between taxes and jobs being shipped overseas.....that is not the question. The question is whether it makes sense to continue giving tax breaks to those who choose to ship jobs overseas.