Potential QB for LSU?

His coach doesn't like the transfer...can't blame him, but when he brings up the thought the rule isn't written as it should be, does he have a point?

http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...football-championship-subdivision-rule-021215

 

I hear less is just going to switch to a direct snap to the fullback so he can bring in another TE.

 

That's actually pretty funny.

 

So, he's moving LeBeau to fullback and calling the play "TomCat?"

 

Link not working

 

No idea what happened there...sorry.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...football-championship-subdivision-rule-021215

 

I'm in favor of kids having some flexibility in terms of their careers.. if these coaches got the head gig offer at Oregon think most would take it, no? Hired guns..

 

Depends on what coach we are talking about right? Obviously

 

No question. This is true. Still, coaches can move on regardless of who they have committed or developed without a second thought in most cases. These kids get bound for so long it seems petty to stand in the way and complain instead of using it as a tool to pat your program on the back to bring in more and more talented but overlooked kids.

 

Yeah I'm not sure how much I buy into the "You commit to the school not to the coach" bit. I mean I get the premise, but if that is the case, then why not full disclosure of your intentions?