Well, you provided no link at all. I ask again . . . what exactly is the SEC procedure? Have they never published it? How do you know what it is? It means the evaluation isn't opaque to everyone not named Slive.
We can all debate on that Dial hit if it was legal or not, the fact of the matter is that it was dirty, and a cheap shot, and something Andre Waters would have done.
If you are running toward the play, you are not defenseless, you are in the play. if you don't want to get hit, get out of there. But it was definitely helmet to helmet contact and unnecessary roughness. You don't have to take a guy out to block him.
Just a little preseason Crimson humor. Though I understand Murray is working on a complete new contingency plan for his next interception.
I know their procedures from conversations with a few of the refs. The one that went into detail about their review system was Penn Wagers. I do recall coming across an article that touched on the SEC's system. I believe it was on SECSports but I'm not 100% sure. I'll make a note to see if I can find it again. Heck, I can't recall what I was looking for when I came across the article red so it may take me a bit.
