Why don't you just provide the evidence about the SEAL interview, FBI verification process? Be specific! You hold posters on an internet forum to a higher standard of proof than the White House. That's absurd. Anyway, will have to address the topic again later....
Carney looks that way at every press conference. Anyone who has seen any of his press conferences knows this. You won't know who these guys are, nor do you need to know who they're talking to. It's called national security. It also the reason why there are such things as security clearances. Believe it or not, some things in this country need to remain secret. The FBI is not subordinate to the White House. They are subordinate to the Justice Department.
Here is a link: Taliban commander vows to avenge Bin Laden's death | World news | guardian.co.uk was also reported on fox thirty minutes ago that the Taliban confirmed obl's death. Yes the Taliban. And I know the diffrence between the Taliban and al qaeda.
The position held by sane people is that Bin Laden was killed by DEVGRU on Sunday. It is backed up by acknowledgements from the President, CIA, Military, and FBI. It is stated as fact. We put a bullet in his skull and carried his body out of his house. The only thing you can support your claims with is the suppositions of individuals with varying degrees of credibility. For every quote you can possibly supply stating Usama was dead there are ten more refuting it. Sure there is. There are DNA tests, there are confirmations from both protaganist and antagonistic sources (Al Quida), there are hundreds of witnesses who saw his body on the carrier, there are dozens of individuals who have seen the photos of his body. That is more than enough for any sane person to know that Bin Laden was killed in a raid conducted by DevGru. The reason you reject all of that is because you are crazy. Come on dude. Do you not understand how the world works. do you really think the names of the dudes that killed the HJIC can be public domain. Do you think even for a second that those dudes wouldn't become instant targets if they were known? Also even if they were interviewed on the front page of the New York Times you would say the dudes interviewed were just actors or some other balogne because you are crazy, and can't separate the real world from Tom Clancy novels.
This is an outright lie or gross ignorance of history. Argentina has never owned the Falklands. Britain discovered, colonized, and has always owned the Falklands. The people of the Falklands are White English-speaking people with British citizenships and British ancestry. The Falklands have no native peoples. Even the sheep are British. Who is being disingenuous? Did Britain win because it used nuclear weapons on Argentina? Nope. You claimed that no nation had ever attacked a nuclear power. You have been shown that Egypt, Pakistan, Syria, Chechnya, and Argentina have all done so. Your failure to acknowledge this is dishonest.
Holy crap. When I raised my hand and swore an oath to serve my nation, I agreed to serve the entire nation. I've got nothing else to say.
