W - UNC - 28-14 W - Vandy - 31-3 W - MSU - 27-20 W - WV - 31-30 W - UT - 30-10 L - UF - 17-28 W - McNeese - 48-7 L - Auburn - 20-24 W - Bama - 21-14 W - ULM - 45-3 W - Ole Miss - 23-14 W - Arkansas - 31-24 No basis for any of these.
I like the no BS bottom line - and I hope your baseless predictions come true!! :thumb: 'cept for Auburn.
LSU 31 - UNC 24 Distractions deter the dream for UNC. LSU 28 - Vandy 0 They're much better. C'mon. LSU 21 - MSU 10 I think MSU starts off hot, goes up 10 nothing but the Tigers score 21 unanswered. LSU 24 - WVU 27 Speedy offense and underrated defense absolutely shock the Tigers. Bill Stewart doesn't realize they won until three days later. LSU 10 - UT 7 Tennessee has it's sights on a good SEC win but falls short as the Tigers overcome. LSU 17 - UF 21 A relatively low scoring game. The Tigers were the better team, however, the 12th man proves to be a factor. LSU 49 - McNeese 3 The Tigers take out it's frustrations form the previous week on a completely unprepared opponent. LSU 24 - Auburn 14 They defy history and put a relatively weak Auburn out of it's misery. LSU 28 - Bama 31 Bama steals one in a heart breaker from the Tigers. LSU 41 - ULM 0 Again, frustrations from the previous week leave the opponent absolutely baffled and confused as to what happened. LSU 24 - Ole Miss 21 LSU rolls onward, dismantling Ole Miss. LSU 38 - Ark 35 A last second field goal wraps it up for the Tigers in a tough conference game. Prediction 9-3
I would just like to know what makes Aub / Ark a much improved team? How is Ark's D gonna be any better? What will prevent Aub from the beat down we gave them last year?
I agree, I mean, it is the SEC and I know any team can come to the game and lay a good one on us, but Aub/ Ark still has Major? across their team. Ark is prob the most ? of all with how BAD their D was last year and Aub wasn't much better. I know as bad as LSU's O was we have no room to talk, but our D has shown nothing that would suggest that they would regress and to improve on only allowing 16 points a game could spell at top 5 D. Obviously, we have key areas they need to improve, but I am sure they will. Enough with the 3rd and Chaivs crap b/c he didn't have the talent pool he has now and even then, he posted top 5 D's every few years. As far as our Oline, I was under the impression that it was more of the blocking scheme they were running. I am more familiar with D as that was all I ever played so maybe someone could share further insight on it, but if never seemed that we lacked talent on O, just it was more a problem with MASS CONFUSION>>>> We will see though.
