Offensive Expectations

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Attack Tiger, Feb 18, 2013.

  1. rockwallfan

    rockwallfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    607
    Absolutely! Why should it be outside expectations to be in the top 25 when you always have recruiting in the top 10?
     
  2. cajdav1

    cajdav1 Soldiers are real hero's

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,493
    Likes Received:
    1,331
    Again I say around the to 25-30 as we will never put the ball in the air 50 or more times a game like most the teams high up in the rankings.
     
  3. TwistedTiger

    TwistedTiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    14,073
    Likes Received:
    4,977
    Im not looking for a certain offensive ranking. Id just like to see an offense that isnt one dimensional, predictable and one that uses all its weapons to keep the defense honest. The lack of use of the TEs and RBs in the passing game has been down right criminal. Just making the LBs and safeties play pass defense will greatly improve LSUs offense, just ask Bama.
     
  4. cwatsn

    cwatsn Loyal Servant

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    520
    Likes Received:
    222
    Damn straight! Just win the effing games!!!
     
  5. cwatsn

    cwatsn Loyal Servant

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    520
    Likes Received:
    222
    This.
     
  6. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Rankings take care of themselves. We are and always will be a run first power offense. That is what wins NCs. We need to be able to pass efficently and most of all take advantage of situations that give opportunities to score. In the past we have fallen into play calling ruts or changed away from success for no apparent reason. To have a plan for play calling AND the ability to adjust is what we need. That coupled with good execution will provide an offense that matches our D.
    If we run the offense well the rankings will follow. To obcess with rankings is to lose the forest for the trees.
     
    Attack Tiger likes this.
  7. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    I'm not expecting shit next season. Expectations are good for absolutely nothing, unless you are a coach or player. I'll be satisfied with 9 or 10 wins, and an offense that actually looks like it's played offense before.
     
  8. Attack Tiger

    Attack Tiger Reformed Sunshine Pumper

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    652
    That's kinda what we've had, which is altogether satisfying AND disappointing...a TRUE double-edged sword.

    FWIW, I largely agree with you.

    Sadly, you and I are a minority. It's all or...well, all. There seems to be no other option.
     
  9. Attack Tiger

    Attack Tiger Reformed Sunshine Pumper

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    652
    Can I like this twice?
     
  10. LSUDad

    LSUDad Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    9,106
    Likes Received:
    3,603
    Nice write-up, but lets look at last season's TE's. We had the Old Ms. game where Travis Dickson caught 5 passes for 69 yds. You know the other two TE's Clement and Jacobs only caught 5 passes each, the entire year? How can they have brick hands, we never saw them in the offense? Thats what the NFL scout was talking about, the usage of the TE's at LSU. DeSean Smith maybe one of the better to come out of the state in years. The TE's was used at times, but not fully. Go back and look at the only rushing TD Russell Shepard had this year, the FB/HB/TE in that set was Chase Clement.

    As for FB's. in the Cam offense, the FB with the Ravens had 27 receptions this year.

    As for the WR's in this offense, most of the problem is not in the WR, it was the offense. Won't go into too much detail, but this also will change. You are right, personnel changes, gave the advantage to the other side.
     

Share This Page