Animal trafficking? How in the hell are they going to find a rhino when they can't find 11 million illegals roaming around? Hell! There's 23000+ living in 1 house in GA. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ed-aliens-all-at-the-same-address-in-atlanta/
lol non-scandal... when was the last time someone required IMMUNITY to testify on a subject, after pleading the 5th, in a case where nothing was done wrong? You really are a special kind of stupid.
lt was addressing what you erroneously said about 1984. Wrong on so many accounts in this part alone. I don't have time to disect the rest but just to show any readers how delusional and wrong you are. First of all, my comment was about gun laws. You're trying to spin but the fact is that New York has among the most restrictive gun laws in the nation and you're dead wrong on when "the law" was signed. When you say they were passed before obama was prez, apparently you missed the passage of the NY SAFE Act in January 2013. Just a few of the changes include specified rifle magazines are banned: a) manufactured after 1994; and b) the magazine holds in excess of 10 rounds (handguns included). A 10 round magazine is permissible, but may only contain 7 rounds. And if you think that law had nothing to do with the dumbass in the white house who exploited members of families who'd lost kids by parading them on televsion and his bickering and moaning. Did you see how pissed he was when his gun legislation failed?!?!LMAFAO. ONE OF MANY of his failed policies. In the voice of Andy Lambros, "How was that?"
Evidence please. Oh, that's right....you have none. In fact, to the contrary. What we now know is the liberal groups were also singled out by using search terms such as Progressive and that the guy who actually headed up the inquiry was a conservative republican who laughed at the idea that there was any political motivation. I'm sure that the fat heads you listen to on the radio and fixed news are still bristling with the idea that they are ready to reveal something huge, but guess what.....the same idiots were also convinced that the election was in the bag for Romney, that it was a done deal. ONCE MORE: YOU HAVE NOTHING, NOT A DAMN THING.
gyver, the vast majority of these businesses are already providing insurance coverage to their employees so for them their will be absolutely no change. the law is expected to affect .2% of small businesses, or around 10,000 small businesses out of 6 million. further, employers are only required to pay for half of their employees health care coverage to avoid penalty. the ny gun law does nothing to limit the second amendment rights of the us constitution and has been upheld by court after court since its inception.
nothing about the NY SAFE act does anything to impede the second amendment and it has been upheld by court after court. I was originally referring to the handgun ban in NY city but I will go a step further and say that Obama had absolutely nothing to do with the the SAFE act either. But you never let the facts get in the way of a good story do you?
Stop spinning. Nowhere did I mention the 2nd. I showed liberties that were lost. They're relative to safety, in case you don't know. I don't give a phuck what you were referring to, you were still wrong. I'm not even sure what the phuck you're talking about, a handgun ban. I do know you keep losing but you don't realize it. You're given facts and you deflect (at least try) them and inject something non-related but deceitfully similar. Equating New York society being liberal to their gun laws; or taking an example of a loss of liberty and trying to act like loss of the 2nd was in play. Something you mentioned in the other thread told me even further that you have some racial issues. It explains your over-charged emotion in discussing anything related. You've yelled, called names, really lost is on several occassions- like at TigersTailgating a few posts above. If you don't get help with us...
Thomas Arielly • a year ago − This is a no brainer for most businesses. Lets say an employer pays around $6500/year for my health coverage. Now, if the company chooses to drop coverage, they will pay a fine of $2000 - a net gain to the bottom line of $4500. Even if they WANT to provide coverage as an employee benefit, they put themselves at a competitive disadvantage with other companies that have dropped healthcare costs from their bottom line. Ten percent?!? It won't take long before the vast majority of businesses drop healthcare. A company like wal mart will definitely do this. Wall Street journal estimates %18 of all businesses will opt to take the penalty and save money on the bottom line. Time to really look at Kelly Temp stock. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._largest_employer_in_us_is_a_temp_agency.html