Obama rejects all war options

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by SabanFan, Nov 12, 2009.

  1. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
  2. DRC

    DRC TigerNator

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    374
    Its obvious there is a lot in in-fighting going on in the administration which is causing the indecisiveness. They've had a couple months to study these proposals and should have an answer. Nato wants more troops, our commander on the ground wants more troops but the bureaucrats are questioning the need because of Karzai. Thats not a good reason to deny the safety of our troops. If thats the case, pull out. When your commander on the ground says we need more troops, you either send them or get our guys out of harms way. We are already seeing casualties increase.

    This is a bad decision.
     
  3. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    It's a NON-decision. Obama is incapable of being, and unqualified to be, our Commander-In-Chief. He's still running for president instead of being president.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    The bad decision was going in there in the first place. No declaration of war.

    Just War Theory out the door...
     
  5. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,326
    Likes Received:
    575
    http://obama.3cdn.net/417b7e6036dd852384_luzxmvl09.pdf
    Obama's strategy for Afghanistan!
    Obama says here he will re-deploy troops to Afghanistan!

    But lately he's said victory isn't necessary?
    Obama: 'Victory' Not Necessarily Goal in Afghanistan - FOXNews.com

    What do you expect people?
    We all know how weak the Democrats are on national defense and the military.
    Prediction, with the financial problems we face expect the military to downsize once again on Obama's watch.
    Also wait until we get into another war and don't have the equipment we need to protect the country and the troops.
     
  6. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    he did already increase troop #s there 50%.
     
  7. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,757
    Likes Received:
    17,053
    I don't know that I'd call him indecisive. He's been very decisive about not giving a damm about victory, or about making us appear weak and uncommitted to our enemies.
     
  8. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247

    Irrelevant, even if true. The generals say they need 40,000 troops and that's all he needs to know. He's a neophyte.
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,755
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    This =

    This. He increased the troop count before the General he appointed said he needed more. That means in addition to. So what does he do? He says okay I'll send more but it will take till almost 2012 to get them there. Well thanks a lot!!! What a complete ass this guy is. Does he not realize that his decision to "not put our troops in harms way" is actually putting the troops we have in harms way in greater danger!!!! If this idiot were President in 1940 we would have never fought WWII

    Screw this muslim prick.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. CajinTigah

    CajinTigah Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    31
    Better check on when those troops were scheduled for deployment, I think they got orders under Bush.
     

Share This Page