Nope...nothing to see here (damning liberal tomfoolery)

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by uscvball, Oct 18, 2016.

Page 2 of 4
  1. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Hell, who does?
     
    LaSalleAve, Oct 19, 2016
    #11
  2. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    That's gonna look really good if he wins.

    American President on trial for raping a 13 year old. But we have to remember he is right about everything. She must have deserved it.
     
    LaSalleAve, Oct 19, 2016
    #12
  3. mancha

    mancha Alabama morghulis

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    3,242
    Jane Doe's integrity is already called into question in another ongoing trial.

    http://abc7.com/news/derrick-roses-attorney-calls-jane-doe-the-shot-caller/1561691/
     
    mancha, Oct 19, 2016
    #13
  4. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    It wasn't a sidestep. I must be slipping here if I have to point out my point.....gotdamn. The story is ridiculous....for both of them. I don't believe that either WJC or DT were involved with Epstein. Moving on...
     
    uscvball, Oct 19, 2016
    #14
  5. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    10,176
    The Feds don't think the 'story' is ridiculous
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit

    .....A federal judge in New York has ordered counsel for Donald Trump and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein to appear in court along with the attorney for a woman referred to only as “Jane Doe” who alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her when she was 13...Judge Ronnie Abrams has slated an initial status conference in the civil lawsuit for 16 December in a New York district court.....

    "Moving on",.. as in, "I will see no evil" ?

    Face it,.. Donald Trump should not be President
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2016
    GiantDuckFan, Oct 19, 2016
    #15
  6. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536
    Neither should have Obama yet you voted for that anti-American disgusting pos twice.
     
    tirk, Oct 19, 2016
    #16
  7. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156

    Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams? The same Ronnie Abrams whose brother is uber lib Dan Abrams? The same Ronnie Abrams who was appointed by Obama? The same Ronnie Abrams whose husband is Greg Andres....who received a huge retainer from Goldman Sachs and that Goldman Sachs is a huge, long term client at Davis Polk and the Judge’s husband is a partner at the firm. Per the sampling below, deals totaling over $9 billion have been handled by Davis Polk on behalf of Goldman Sachs in just the past two years? That Ronnie Abrams? The one who ruled on a Wall Street case that benefited her husband's company?

    http://wallstreetonparade.com/2014/05/a-mangled-case-of-justice-on-wall-street/

    As a reminder...
    "Canon 2A of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges mandates that:. “An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen.”

    That Ronnie Abrams? That bitch isn't fit to judge anyone.


    America shouldn't have to choose between either of them. But the fact that you are more worried about his current issues than Hillary selling this country out for her own financial gain is really facking sad.
     
    uscvball, Oct 19, 2016
    #17
  8. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    10,176
    Well, I'm not perfect,..

    McCain or Romney might have worked out ok,.. but Sarah Palin as VP,.. yikes.

    yet, with respect to "Canon 2A of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges",.. she remains a Federal Judge

    I'm most concerned about Trump's total lack of judgement,.. him leading the United States,.. fuck, he can't even control his own mouth,.. America's leading Diplomat,.. holy shit, Trump would be horrible, the worst, he'd make a complete and utter fool of himself,.. and us
    .
    It is really facking sad, but Hillary is by far the better choice
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2016
    GiantDuckFan, Oct 19, 2016
    #18
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,922
    There, now we can agree
     
    shane0911, Oct 19, 2016
    #19
    StaceyO likes this.
  10. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    10,176
    A better choice for America
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2016
    GiantDuckFan, Oct 19, 2016
    #20
Page 2 of 4

Share This Page