It appears that an arguement can be made that 118 D-1 teams are better than Idaho. :hihi: ESPN's "Bottom 10"
Come on guys. You can rag the Pac-10 for not being as good as the SEC. I think Vball would even give us that. But to say USC is not worthy because of a perceived soft schedule is ludicrous. USC has CRUSHED SEC competition ever since 03. It's not their fault that the other teams in their conference cannot seem to get over the hump (like when UCLA was a pretty damn good program). Obviously they don't have a tough rival or 6 like LSU. They do try to play at least a decent OOC. Their OOC for USC the next 3 years will probably be as tough as anyones. Give USC their just due.
I'm fairly confident she knows I'm just giving her a hard time and mean nothing by it. I can't speak for the others intentions, but I'm only messing with her just like I would/do with fans of other schools.
She also catches stuff from 30 other people and is a good poster. Seriously, though...anyone that doesn't think USC could do very well in the SEC is crazy.
I never said they wouldn't. However, someone who gives us flack for scheduling the likes of Tulane or La Tech will get some right back if their team scheduled someone who is arguably the worst team in D-1A.
