seems like a theme with you haters is to ignore all data and metrics for success to imply you see things others dont. you cant even define a metric for success, you just ignore data and call the ones using data for analysis "blind" that tomahawk dunk by eason seemed a bit risky. but chance favors the aggressor i guess.
its utterly irrelevant. almost all polls and awards based on votes are subjective and useless. thats why the selection comittee doesnt care about the polls. wise fans shouldnt either. what matters is getting in to the tournamennt and getting a good seed, so you have a chance to go deep in the tournament. thats a successful season. again i am aware you refuse to discuss the metrics for program success, we wouldnt want a rational analysis of anything. you guys want to claim you are strategy jedi that see what wade doesnt.
reid plus minus was negative 6. o'neal plus 13. surely o'neal is gonna start taking away more of reid's minutes.
Bullshit, you are unable to have a human discussion. Therefore I usually don’t want to engage. I am happy to get the win and hope that the lull this past month has been corrected and/or was largely due to Pinson being out. Still a little disappointed we didn’t pull away, but at this point any win is great. Adding a home Q2 win (vs net 54 MOOU) and a borderline road Q1 win (vs net 73 ATM) is good, definitely better than losses. Q1 5-4 Q2 4-2 Q3 4-1 Q4 4-0 Remaining: 199 UGA, at 105 SCAR, at 4 KY, 143 MIZ, at 32 ARK, 23 Bama Q1: Bama, at KY, at ARK Q2: at SCAR Q3: MIZ Q4: UGA If we can do better than 3-3 I might have a little hope going into the SECT. PS - Top 25 is not useless, but I’m not discussing with an unrefined robot
For anyone that cares to track important stats moving forward: Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75. Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135. Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240. Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353. https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-men/d1/ncaa-mens-basketball-net-rankings The incredibly valuable AP rankings can also be found at the above link. LSU 17-7 Net #16, AP #34 Q1: 5-4 [wins: at aTm-73, at FU-45, TENN-10 (AP #19), KY-4 (AP #5), vs Wake Forest-33 (AP #31)] Q2: 4-2 [losses: at Vandy-81, ARK-32 (AP #27)] Q3: 4-1 [losses: OM-107, win: Ohio-85 (AP #40)] Q4: 4-0 Remaining: 199 UGA, at 105 SCAR, at 4 KY (AP #5) 143 MIZ, at 32 ARK (AP #27), 23 Bama (AP #32) Q1: Bama, at KY, at ARK Q2: at SCAR Q3: MIZ Q4: UGA
I wasn't able to watch a lot of the game but did listen and it sounds as if O'neal is really finding his game. If this move happens I hope it isn't based purely on +/- because that is a shitty stat to make such decisions on. It can be very deceptive at times.
it looks to me that shareef is making reid play harder… reid seemed to have more active feet last night….
