Loop holes?

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUpride123, Jul 10, 2011.

  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    SO I came across this article from 2007 about the Bush Tax cuts and found an interesting line....

    Guess Who Really Pays the Taxes — The American Magazine

    "For example, the United States now has the second-highest corporate income tax in the developed world, after Japan."


    I thought, surely this can't be true, surely i can't....


    US Corporate Tax Rates vs. All OECD Countries | ChrisBanescu.com

    ^^From 2008

    Archived-Articles: US Companies Pay the Highest Taxes in the World

    ^^ From 2009

    [FONT=times new roman,times]"2010 Corporate Tax Rate: US = 46.2%, China = 25%"[/FONT]

    Now before you Lib's go and blow your load, I know there is a difference in statutory and real taxes paid....

    I also know that most all of the US based companies find HUGE tax deductions/Loop Holes

    However, if you cut the loop holes, they must lower the tax rate.....


    What do ya'll think about this?

    Flat tax all around?
     
  2. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    10% and opt-out of all the govt. crap.
     
  3. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Wouldn't a flat tax essentially be a raise in taxes on the rich? Isn't that what the GOP is fighting so vigorously for? These poor billionaires who just can't seem to feed their families....
     
  4. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    Nice exaggeration again. You are on fire..

    You are missing the point.

    The amount of deductions these people can claim is the reason people like you believe they should have their taxes raised when all is needed is a drop in the tax rate and limit the deductions.

    Yes, they would then be paying more that what they do now.

    They could easily get more revenue from a 20% flat tax and zero deductions...
     
  5. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    And as importantly, we could slash the need for most of the IRS. Of course, we would probably put a lot of accountants out of business but when government is the driving force behind jobs, it's a problem.
     
  6. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    That was my point. A flat tax would essentially mean that rich people would pay more taxes. I thought that was a no no?
     
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    No one said its a no no. It is more to do with raising a percentage that just gets negated by deductions...
     
  8. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    These rich billionaires just might take their football and leave.
     
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    They've already gone. Their money is in Switzerland and much of their investments. Certainly the CEO's have moved their factories and any new jobs overseas. Nothing will trickle down to you.
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    They've already gone. Their money is in Switzerland and much of their investments are overseas. Certainly the CEO's have moved their factories and any new jobs overseas. Nothing will trickle down to you.
     

Share This Page