Justice Scalia found dead; The balance of the Supreme Court about to shift

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by islstl, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    Garland is not a moderate. He ruled to uphold a Washington D.C. law banning possession of handguns that was later overturned by SCOTUS with Scalia writing the majority opinion.
     
  2. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    I think Obama's team just researched possible candidates and sorted them according to the amount of glowing praise they received from republicans...
     
    islstl likes this.
  3. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,931
    For all those asking why the electorate is so pissed at the GOP and "what do you mean they caved" watch what happens here. A lot of big talk but in the end barrachmed will have his justice
     
    el005639 and islstl like this.
  4. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    It won't be caving. The Senate's job is advise and consent. Historically that means if he's qualified and not too radical (either way) or doesn't have the 'live boy/dead girl' issue he should be confirmed. That is why Scalia, Sotomayor, Roberts et al had 90+ Yes votes. That is the price you pay for losing the presidency.
    BTW as you said HRC would name a much worse candidate.
     
    LSUMASTERMIND likes this.
  5. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    For me personally, that would be straw that broke the camel's back and the end of my association with the gop.
     
  6. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    Exactly, most in the GOP praised this guy just last year. Now they ole Mitch says he waiting on the NRA to give their blessing. Such bullshit this politics is on both sides. Dems did something similar with Alito.

    However, Scalia, actually wanted Kagen to be nominated.
     
    kcal likes this.
  7. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,931
    Oh it absolutely would be.
     
  8. kcal

    kcal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,961
    Likes Received:
    7,880
    and next time a vacancy comes up within 2 yrs of the president's term ending either the dems or gop will justify not moving forward. what a mess.

    hear the guy and vote up or down!
     
    KyleK and LSUMASTERMIND like this.
  9. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    exactly, vote no if you dont want him, but hear the guy. No one says you have to confirm him.
     
    KyleK and islstl like this.
  10. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    The Democrats talked of a filibuster, but Alito went through the nomination and confirmation process on a pretty standard timeline. The opposing party always puts up a fuss. It's their job to ensure that their interests are represented as well in the nominee's interpretation of the Constitution. I don't think we'll ever see a unanimous nominee again. Hard to believe now that Scalia was confirmed 98-0.

    That was absolutely nothing like what the GOP is doing now by refusing to even consider or hold a hearing to vet a nominee. What the GOP is doing now is pretty unprecedented. The Democrats have talked shit, uttered ridiculous opinions, but never have they coordinated and taken this kind of action. Even Robert Bork received a hearing. I have no problems with vetting the candidate, disagreeing with his interpretations and qualifications and then not voting in his appointment. I do have a problem with refusing to participate in a Constitutionally mandated process.
     
    Winston1 likes this.

Share This Page