oh they all knew Sandusky's anal sex with the boy was both illegal and heinous, what i was thinking is that since it appeared to be consensual sex, that they thought it would be easier to cover up (as in they thought the boy would be less likely to tell anybody about it)
As for the McQuery question. PS has said he will be in the booth and not on the sideline. All this leads me to believe that PS is worried about letting him go. There must be more information that they are worried about him spilling, if they keep him employed they can control what he says. I would suspect it would involve intimate details about what he saw and what he told Paterno and others.......or they may be worried about a law suit.
This story is all going to come out. Anyone still holding secrets had better get ready to see them in the headlines.
If an older woman chasing a younger boy is a cougar is an older man chasing a younger boy a nittany lion?
I asked in another thread what a woman or wife's perspective is on this. To know that your spouse you sleep with has been sodomizing small boys must hit hard. How don't you feel something is wrong? A woman is suppose to have that sixth sense. Think of the humiliation of it all. What would be a wife's response to hearing this about her husband?
I'm an old timer and don't always agree with Red, but he nailed it. And as someone else wrote, us old timers aren't alway right. Just 99% of the time. :hihi:
I was speaking of this new poster that has only been on a few weeks. When you are new it's not really good to be in personal arguments with old timers. I'm not really talking about a disagreement on an issue. When you are newer to the board and some old timer steps on you , sometimes it's better to take your lick and move on. That's all I was saying and I was wrong in saying it and sticking my stupid arse nose in someone else's business.
