Thats the opposite of how it should work. This is the point or do you not care about the constitution?
Saying that the what if question was an action. I was pointing out that there are multiple possibilities that were in play that day. Any one of them should be considered and investigated to find the facts. You implied that a speculation would be all required to convict someone.
No, I am challenging your assertion that the 4th amendment doesnt seem to apply here. Did you know that the 4th specifically mentions "papers". You know, you comparing to "letters" seems like you dont know much. “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” What do Hannity's Texts have to do with Jan 6th?
Trumpican's are the dedicated sheep following Shepard Trump wherever he takes the Republican party with no thought of consequences for the party in the future as long as they get reelected - Examples = Stoneless Limpsnake McCarthy, Jordan, Gosar, Green, . . . . Who I call Republicans are party members who are sometimes with Trump, and can be solid supporters of Trump but have the balls to speak against Trump when he has crossed the line - Gov Chris Christy, McConnel, are good examples. IMO
Who said he was? He's not that I know of - unless he posted your GF's picture in Boobies and Heinies.
