January 6

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUTiga, Jul 27, 2021.

  1. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Then you don't believe in Congressional oversight, and by extension would prefer autocracy.
     
  2. XXL TideFan

    XXL TideFan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,098
    Likes Received:
    1,223
    Contemptible bunch of worms.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  3. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    I was stating facts. You prove time and time again that you don't know how our democracy and economy works. Your recommendation that Congress has no subpoena power means they'd lose the power of oversight. and we'd have a ruler with absolute power. Which method would you prefer over subpoenas? Capture and torture?
     
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Move to Russia. Putin loves sheep of your kind.
     
  5. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Congressional investigations do not necessarily have the goal of prosecution. You make no fucking sense.
     
  6. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,757
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    subpeonas are fine for the justice dept in the context of an underlying crime, for example eric holder trafficking weapons. ginny thomas has done nothing wrong and has nothing to do with anything.

    subpeonas should be a justice dept tool. congress should not be putting guns to people;s heads to force them to talk about nonsense.

    for example, they should be investigating fauci and wuhan. but they should only have the authority to subpeona him to the extent a crime is involved like illegaly funding gain of fuction research.
     
  7. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,757
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    if no crime is involved then they arent important enough to force subpoenas on anyone.

    whatever ginny thomas did, it doesnt require a federal investigation. she can email and text whatever the fuck she wants. they are going after her as a proxy punishment of her husband for roe v wade.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  8. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,757
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    congress can investigate without subpoena, ahtough i would prefer it was left to the justice dept. and even if i opposed congressional oversight completely it would not mean i favor autocracy. try to make logical sense.

    congress is using this as a political theater, not a real investigation. and that is fine i guess good for those dumfucks. but they should not be allowed to threaten people with cages to play their dumb game.
     
  9. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,757
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    grow up bud. this person you are trying to insult was being critical of our government. calling them names and shit is not needed. grow the fuck up.

    i think you get frustrated because i prove you wrong and you act out. like a few days ago when i showed you that biden did in fact say that the vax prevents covid. or when you listed all those Muslim terrorists and said they were not. i think you just expect that nobody does any research and you can just get away with lies and this makes you very angry and you act out by insulting, like a child might.
     
    fanatic and shane0911 like this.
  10. BornOnTheBayou

    BornOnTheBayou 2022 Masters Pick 'Em Champion

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2021
    Messages:
    1,894
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Look in a mirror. You lead the pack in not making sense.
     

Share This Page