Komrad @Rex read and heed. Coming for your side like a freight train from the far right. 1,000’s of commies employed in the federal will be TERMINATED and replaced with loyalists. Planned and will be ready to execute if Trump gets re-elected. https://conservativebrief.com/jim-4-64787/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD
Doesn't change the facts. GOP loyalists and closest ones to Trump are the ones testifying. From the presidents WH lawyer to both of the minority leaders and others who worked in close proximity to the oval office, they are the ones front and center at the hearings. If this was a partisan witch hunt you'd think it would be dems testifying. While you may label the left, and the more evenly keeled I might add, who choose to listen to evidence about an authoritarian wanna be president as commies. In return, we consider you traitors. History will show we as the patriots and you as the sheep. No question about that one. And like the people testifying, a lot of us are life long republicans who only wish for a fitting republican president.
and what do these facts indicate as far as criminal charges for trump? doesnt seem like any of this has a point but dem grandstanding. they threatened the non-compliant with contempt of congress. they just found bannon guilty of this insane charge. they are literally telling people they will lock you in a cage if you dont testify, so i wouldnt take their testifying as agreement with the dem cause.
agree and we should also consider that these are dc rehabilitation tours in which the participants are trading their “testimony” for good graces. these productions would be more fun if there were actual rebuttal questions asked of the participants…
1st: Watch the hearings and you'll be educated to the list of charges that could apply. 14 hours worth up to now. Exhausting to explain to deniers. 2nd: "dem grandstanding". Not when you consider it's (for the upteenth time) republicans testifying. And not just any republicans. Those closeest to POTUS. 3rd: It only took one Trump loving juror to vote no. I didn't think there was a chance in hell Bannon would be found guilty because of that. They obviously found a pool of jurors who believed in the rule of law. Unlike some people on this board. Good possibility the judge was appointed by Trump, just like the other 60+ who threw election challenges out of court.
It’s amazing. You guys keep watching these hearings but when people ask you about them, you don’t have any answers!
i have watched. you are deflecting. you cant even seem to name a single charge. i have asked many times.