January 6

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUTiga, Jul 27, 2021.

  1. rockwallfan

    rockwallfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    607
    That’s no more than a stupid question. I don’t know if your thinking cap is lost, but that assertion could’ve only been seen on a far right site. 80% error rate, yet be accepted as a machine to vote!!! No question, it was only after the election this problem was found; indicating nothing was done to ensure accuracy before the election, when we had a president complain for his 4 years the only way he could lose the next election was if it was rigged. You should leave this site and never return.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2022
    Tiger in NC likes this.
  2. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    Question, if the election was secure, why are Dems pushing to pass an election bill?
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/...n_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf

    True enough, just about 70%.

    The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.

    Why cant Dominion meet federal guidelines?
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  4. rockwallfan

    rockwallfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    607
    Just plain stupid. The Unabomber went to Harvard too. Not impressed. Always conspiracy theories. No well known fact involved here. Next theory please.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2022
    Tiger in NC likes this.
  5. kluke

    kluke Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,665
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    The correlation between the number of votes and the quality of the candidate is not that strong. People vote or don't vote for a lot of reason's other than the quality of the candidate. Biden was an old lifetime political hack in a time when people wanted change more than anything. He shouldn't even have gotten the nomination. A lot of his votes were anti-Trump votes, which doesn't speak to his presidential capabilities. Which he has demonstrated are minimal.
     
    shane0911, Winston1 and rockwallfan like this.
  6. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    Yea, record breaking voting registration numbers during mass mail out ballots had zero to do with any of it huh....... Totaly normal.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,706
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    Yea. All sources I dont agree with have no merit and are stupid.
     
  8. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Stupid is as stupid does.
     
    rockwallfan likes this.
  9. rockwallfan

    rockwallfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    607
    But come on, man. Would any voting machine in any free country be allowed with such a horrible potential error rate? Be honest. I’d think such a product would never sell the first unit. As contentious as our elections are, especially this last one, would you not think test, after test, after test would be done on them before being accepted? And since this “study” isn’t front page news I’d have to think it’s garbage. Can’t get past go.
     
    seabrookcajun and Tiger in NC like this.
  10. mancha

    mancha Alabama morghulis

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    3,242
    They pushed to pass an election bill to federalize voting rights to counter red states passing their own voter reform legislations.

    It is not about security, it is that they think red states are curbing voter access. The kind of access the dems were able to use very effectively in 2020.
     

Share This Page