Uhh....no. A&M has 2 SEC losses, one to us and one to Florida. We have losses to Florida and Bama. Bama losing to Auburn would give them 2 West losses. The head-to-head matchup win over A&M gives us the tie-breaker.
If I understand the rules correctly, LSU would go. It would be a 3-way tie between LSU, Bama, and a&M. Bama is eliminated by having the worst record within the division. Then LSU goes by virtue of head-to-head over A&M.
I think you've got that wrong. Under that scenario, both of Bama's SEC losses would be to SEC West teams, while A & M and LSU have lost to Florida from the East. In the West, LSU lost to Bama; A & M lost to us. Therefore, we'd own the tiebreaker over A & M because we beat them head-to-head.
Ah, right. I figured I hadn't thought it through enough. I guess LSU would go. Pretty funny tie though.
It's a typical sort of SEC tie. We beat the crap out of each other, then typically beat the crap out of teams from other conferences in bowl games.
You're forgiven, we understand that Bama math. You're the only fan base who uses pie R squared to count titles.
I'm not sure there is enough time for Auburn to "grow" a big enough Richard to do any damage, however, with surgical advancements being what they are, perhaps there is a "medical" alternative????
Are you not a teacher??? I thought you all had to come up with some other words for "spank dat ass"???? Something like, "We would go to ATL and administratively discipline that Bulldog posterior for a second year in a row".
