Hillary's E-Mail (Breaking News: Smoking Gun Officially Announced)

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Mar 12, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    So you admit that Clinton did not say what you keep saying she did? Now you confuse her with Obama and Rice.
     
  2. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    The Bush Administration knew the Intel was shit, but they also knew their number 1 priority was to go to war with Iraq. Now my friend and thousands of others are dead or fucked, and no one is held accountable but Hilary is a criminal because of a fucking email server and 4 people dying.

    Double standard. when y'all start holding the Bush administration accountable for their role in the deaths of thousands of Americans I'll roast Clinton right with you on Benghazi.
     
  3. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Ok Bush is fuggin idiot...your turn
     
  4. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Fuck Hilary Clinton
     
    LSUpride123 likes this.
  5. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Ok now that preliminary out of the way. Do I think the bush administration manipulated the evidence to suit the narrative, yes. Do I think it was criminal no, dishonest yes. Same statement applies to Hillary. However the world is better with out Hussain, even if iraq is not
     
  6. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    ok now we are getting somewhere, so my turn for Clinton. I think she thinks there is a different set of rules for her. I think she is a corporatist. She will be another in a long list of politicians that don't serve the American people but will serve the interests of very few. The difference between her and the republican candidates is who she takes care of. In my opinion she is no different than any of the candidates on the right. The only reason I feel that a democrat should be president is because of balance. A republican controlled congress, Supreme Court, senate, and president would be devastating in my opinion.
     
  7. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,755
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    You say this a lot yet ignore the destruction that has come out of the same system run by the left.
     
  8. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    When has there ever been a democrat sweep?
     
  9. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Bad try there. Listen she and Obama and Rice have tried to have it both ways. First they floated a known lie that the Benghazi raid was spontaneous and caused by the film. We know it's a lie by her own email to her daughter and other sources LIKE THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES.
    Now they and especially HRC are trying to gloss over that. No confusion here Red except what you are trying to sow.
     
  10. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    2008-2010; 1992-94 are recent times the Ds had majorities in both houses of congress and the presidency. There are numerous times when Ds used their ability to block cloture to try to force their unrealistic positions on the Rs.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page