My whole point was we shouldn't expect many more points than they scored against Vandy, which was 14. Since 7 of them were a gift of the bullshit holding call, I think it was pretty accurate. Comparing T. Harris was a secondary point.
No, you try again. This offense we were supposed to be so afraid of managed 20 points and were lucky to have that many.
You're point was Treon Harris is a better QB than Doughty. Florida is a much better team than WKU. Everyone expected LSU to win this game by 2 or 3 scores at least. Switch them, put Doughty on Florida's team and Harris on WKU's. You really think Harris would do as well? There is no way.
Typical douchebag, turns up after the game is over to try and make a point that is completely wrong and makes himself look stupid.
Looks like you need to be going on the vegas trip with @tirk and rainman. maybe @shane0911 if they let me go.
This was how the conversation went. You: ERMAGERD, western Kentucky is so good, we have a lot to worry about in this game because of the trouble we had against Florida" Me: they only scored 14 against Vandy, the only decent defense they played, I don't think we have that much to worry about if we can keep th offense going. You: That was the first game, that means NOTHING Western Kentucky scores 20 points, really only deserved 13. You still want to talk about the fact that T. Harris played part of a game earlier in the season and last season, which had nothing to do with florida's offense versus western kentucky's.
The Vanderbilt game did tell us a lot about what to expect out of this game as far as WKU's offense. So your initial comment to me that it was meaningless is obviously wrong.
