good discussion on longhorn network/aggies

You know I really don't think they want this at all, hence this latest message. Iowa St is likely to be in a heap of trouble if the league folds because they have a ton of money that they are counting on from the TV deal that bebe put together last year and blah blah. They want someone to put those arrogant freaking autinites in their damn places. Bebe just assumed the yell leader position and took them balls deep. I can assure you this, the remaining big 12 presidents would put bebe's worthless ass on their shoulders and toss him off the roof given the chance. UTerus will have to alter their stupid network one way or the other because the pac 12 won't stand for it the way it is structured so why not toss bebe and make the changes. Big 12 may not be dead after all.

 

of course ou wants a piece of the lhn pie...why wouldn't they? if you read the article posted in the original post, you will see why. it's really not that hard. as for ou being "willing to stay in the big 12," as some win for ou, you would literally have to be too dumb to read to glean that from that article...which i certainly don't doubt from you shane. you seem like a petulant child in your posting style but keep on keeping on you rockstar.

what's funny is the idea that beebe is some sort of texas puppet. if you actually took the time to familiarize yourself with the facts (i know, it's too much to ask), you would see that it was ou and nebraska that pushed hard for beebe, not texas. in fact, texas backed someone else to be commissioner of the big 12 with kevin left.

Source: Removal of Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe among OU's demands | NewsOK.com

Big 12 names Dan Beebe as new commissioner - USATODAY.com

hmmm, damn pesky facts.

the only reform that will happen is equal revenue sharing on first and second tier content which texas has been supportive of over the last two years. it is oklahoma that will take the biggest hit on that. they were the biggest beneficiary to the unequal revenue sharing (taking home the most money last year) and now they will have to give a piece of that up with no third tier demand to make up for it. ironically, they have ****ed themselves by playing this game. they thought they were holding aces on going to the pac-12 but the pac-12 doesn't want the okie schools without texas. see this:

SOURCE: OU ultimately sought Big 12 reform, not Pac-12 move | NewsOK.com

the problem is, they were playing with 2's and their bluff got called. however, texas is leading the charge on equal revenue sharing on first and second tier rights now to add stability to the conference. and getting rid of that idiot beebe (that's what we get for going with ou and nebraska's recommendation for conference commish i guess) for someone who won't be a punk ass to jim delaney, mike slive, and larry scott (all of which are scumbags trying to ruin college football by racing each other to be the first super conference).

uncle milty,

the pac-12 would love to have texas and oklahoma...but scott doesn't want to give up power on the longhorn network. even though the pac-12 doesn't control third tier revenues now, the idea of a $15M yearly revenue stream that's untapped for the conference is too much for him. of course, he's an idiot as if you read the article in the original post, you will see this already happens in EVERY SINGLE CONFERENCE AND THE SEC SCHOOLS ARE THE BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES OF IT.

 

who hired him? Doesn't matter

Did he allow UTerus to run wild? Yes

Is he going to keep his job? NO

Why did the pac 12 deal fall apart? Uterus and their arrogance


Is the big 12 going to stay together for at least a few more years? It seems so

Seems like I've got it right so far.

 

As long as Tex-ass stays out west and stays completely away from the sec , whatever the do doesn't matter at all to me. Just please don't say Tex-ass wants to come to the sec. We don't need another big headed wanna be bully with a bunch of arrogant fans that thinks their chit don't stink in the sec, we already have bama. That's enough.

 

No worries RW. We would never invite that bunch of aholes anyway. They are sort of like Terrell Owens. Big bitch ass diva and their arrogance destroys everything they come in contact with. History proves this, Ark, Neb, Col, aTm all just got tired of their crap.

Funny thing is, silly bastards named their football stadium after a guy that played football at OU.

 

who hired him does matter when you imply he was texas' boy the whole time. what specifically did beebe do to allow texas to "run wild?" be specific. tell me what texas did that was so bad and outside of the parameters that most other schools do. how many big 12 policies did texas enact unilaterally? be specific shane.

you are awfully good at spewing generalities, ignoring specific facts, and making an absolute ass out of yourself. i'll give you that. i get that you are an okie, but just try for a minute to be objective and lay out what it is SPECIFICALLY that texas did that was so bad.

i doubt you can get much further than "argh, texas bad, texas arrogant, texas aholes, texas made cancer, texas blew up world trade center, texas pussies, texas bla bla bla" but give it the ol' college try.

rwilliams, doubt that would ever happen. not culturally compatible for the most part and would be really bad for college football if texas and/or oklahoma was in the sec.

 

don't misconstrue what i'm saying lsu_sooner, the games would be incredible. ou, texas, lsu, bama, auburn, florida, georgia, tennessee, and arkansas all playing each other every year would be incredibly exciting...

but what would be the point of college football outside the conference? at this point, oklahoma, texas, ohio state, and usc are pretty much the only counterweights to the sec as a whole. if you throw half of those schools in, you might as well just play the sec and call it the college football championship round robin.

i, for one, would love it if texas would step up and schedule more than just arkansas and ole miss from the sec. i would love home and homes with alabama, georgia, tennessee, and lsu. but neither side seems to want it... i believe wholeheartedly that stoops would love the same thing.

 

The Longhorn Network

Now go find your softball. It is somewhere in the woods past the left feild fence.

Oh and for the record I am not an okie.

It is quite evident that you are a UTerus fan and that is fine, however don't show up here and try to tout them as something that they aren't. I know it may be hard for you to understand that everyone outside of austin hates you guys but, well, they do. Why don't you tell me why all this dissent has come about? Why wouldn't the PAC 12 take txass with the lhn as it is? If they would have made concessions all four of those big 12 schools would be iin the pac 12. The pac 12 was willing to take OU/OSU without the whornes and guess what happend? Thats right the pussies threatened to sue the pac 12 and the two Oklahoma schools.

You're little name calling doesn't bother me, in fact it is sort of funny however you just keep digging the hole deeper. You are like my crazy ass sister. Everyone hates her because she is bat sh1t crazy but of course she is right and everyone else is wrong.

 

I'm very surprised the Pac-12 passed on Okie and Okie State. W.J., how much money is UT giving up in this new equal revenue deal? Would they be moving to equal revenue if A&M hadn't bolted?

 

ok shane, the longhorn network is your problem...

do you have a problem with the fact that lsu has made over $7 million in unshared third tier revenues (same as the longhorn network) for the last five years? do you have a problem with the fact that sec teams as a whole took home over $52 MILLION DOLLARS in unshared revenues off their respective third tier content in 2009? a number that dwarfs any other conference?

why didn't you say beebe was letting kansas run roughshod over the big 12 when it sold its third tier rights years ago and made over $7 million in unshared revenues in 2009 while texas made ~$330K? or nebraska with their $4.3M? or oklahoma state with their $6.3M?

since you obviously didn't read the link in the op, maybe you could at least read this link: School-Specific Broadcasting Revenue « and educated yourself on how third tier rights work...and what the longhorn network actually is.

sounds to me like you think everyone except texas should have the right to sell their third tier rights, is that right? or do you just not actually have a handle on the facts as you are completely incompetent?

living in okc makes you an okie...you're surrounded by moutbreathing dumb****s.

so what's your explanation shane? why is the longhorn network so bad? why didn't ohio state's 10 year, 110 million dollar deal make them hated by everyone? Ohio State sells sports media rights for $110M - CBSSports.com

digest all that before you reply this time...so you don't walk right into it again.