Good, Bad, and Ugly in Starkville

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by red55, Sep 13, 2015.

  1. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Could have been worse I suppose, remember when Jason Garrett iced his own kicker?
     
    StaceyO likes this.
  2. COTiger

    COTiger 2010 Bowl Pick 'Em Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,784
    Likes Received:
    6,431
    I see better than I hear.
     
  3. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    what?
     
  4. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    Eh, speak up sonny
     
  5. didit

    didit Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    2,072
    Likes Received:
    1,833
    If's go both ways though... If the refs call all of the holding calls on state that they didn't, would the game have been close... if we get the catch that replay took from us (can't believe they still got it wrong)... if the refs don't give state a first down with 1:09 in the game, they would've had to use their last timeout... So many if's... Won an ugly game on the road with a qb starting only his second game... I'll take it...
     
    StaceyO and TigerTap like this.
  6. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Incredible that people might actually disagree with you. Better get used to it.
     
    TigerTap likes this.
  7. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    If if if, yada, yada yada. We are all glad LSU won. Shoulda been way ahead. Refs shoulda made better calls or maybe the D shouldn'tna held, chop blocked, trash talked, .ect. But they did. The point is that with a 21-6 lead and then a 21-13 lead the game was far from being in hand. LF7 played a fantastic game, don't get me wrong.
    But to continue over and over and over to run him with 8 and 9 in the box without once throwing a play action pass on first down while Les was played not to lose kept the defense on the field way to much for th not to become fatigued almost directly led to putting this one in the loss column. We were good in the first half. We were lucky in the second.
     
    ROY_LA_CA likes this.
  8. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,795
    Likes Received:
    23,951
    This could not be more wrong, but given who is saying it...well...

    Look, no one is saying they don't want 7 getting the ball. We have something of a QB now, they will HAVE to change the philosophy because that shit won't get it done vs. better teams.
     
    TwistedTiger, fanatic and lsu-i-like like this.
  9. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    I want LF7 to get the ball. Just not so many time vs defenses that know he is getting it and where. I don't want to ser himvget injured
     
  10. lsu-i-like

    lsu-i-like Playoff advocate

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17,958
    Likes Received:
    8,799
    On this, yes. It didn't work but MooU pooped their opportunity with an unconscionable delay of game at the end.

    I like how you believe it will get better next week, it has my hopes up that you might just be right.

    I just don't think the argument that this was a well executed power run scheme holds up to scrutiny. You do know even as a Miles supporter it is ok to criticize the guy, right? When you present things in such a binary way it tarnishes your credulity.
     
    ParadiseiNC likes this.

Share This Page