This has been interesting and funny to watch. Many Democrats and left-wing media have little confidence in their candidate, so they're already giving concession speeches by claiming a loss or close victory is representative of their candidate doing a horrible job on the campaign trail. :lol: They're in denial that this is representative of an American public who wanted "change" from the status quo NOT to a far left liberal ideology. This is the same mistake the Democrats made last time they had control. They love to convince themselves that people voted for them due to their views instead of realizing they were simply voting the other guys out. When you campaign on moderate ideas and then slam a liberal agenda down the throats of the voters...your days are numbered. Instead of listening to the people, they're hellbent on changing the rules to proceed with this unwanted agenda. I can't believe (well I can since their Attorney General is part of the problem) nobody has gone to jail for the crap they've pulled in Massachusetts with flip-flopping the rules to benefit the Democrats. It's criminal but not surprising coming from the land of Kennedys. Spin it however you want but this is an indictment on this administration and Congress. Either do what you were elected to do...or be shown the door. It will be close. Hopefully this will be the first of many to fall. Even if she wins, her numbers still dropped 30% NOT due to her...but due to her party and their so-called leaders. Hopefully they'll remain in denial long enough to be replaced. The Blue Dogs need to take note. The far-left liberals will probably be re-elected because they have enough freaks in their area. The moderates can replace all the Blue Dogs if they don't get with the program.
Martha Coakley is Geraldine Ferraro. The Democrats are trying to pull a fast one. :grin: Well, if nothing else, this would be another great reason to vote for her opponent.
You mean dead people on the voting rolls that somehow rise from the dead on election day don't you? Oh wait, I think I hear Red. He is coming to tell us we are crazy and that none of that is true.:lol:
Just checked the news, looking pretty good. I think I am getting a flashback to a phrase my old buddy StadiumSalute coined back during the CWS run. I hope I get to say it later. I'd do it now but it is far too soon. The ability and propensity of the libs to just flat out cheat their asses off is far too great. I won't count chickens before they hatch.
I saw 52-47 for Brown with 18% reporting. Now it's 53-46 for Brown with 21% reporting. Now 52-47 for Brown with 25% reporting. (28K votes ahead) Now 52-47 for Brown with 30% reporting. (36K votes ahead)
could be an interesting evening. did they say what percent of the precincts that is? edit: you edited as i was asking. never mind. lol
Coakley going down in flames..... The state of Massachusetts is about to elect a Rep. Senator to fill the vacant seat of Sen. Kennedy. Democrats are scrambling, playing the blame game to the delight of conservatives everywhere. Is healthcare now dead? Also, anybody see a hint of things to come for the Democrats in 2010? I think the blowback on Obama and Co. is going to be substantial.
I saw 52-47 for Brown with 18% reporting. Now it's 53-46 for Brown with 21% reporting. Now 52-47 for Brown with 25% reporting. (28K votes ahead) Now 52-47 for Brown with 30% reporting. (36K votes ahead) Now 52-47 for Brown with 36% reporting. (42K votes ahead) Now 53-46 for Brown with 40% reporting. (55K votes ahead) Now 52-47 for Brown with 45% reporting. (54K votes ahead) Now 53-47 for Brown with 52% reporting. (67K voted ahead) Now 53-47 for Brown with 57% reporting. Now 53-46 for Brown with 60% reporting.
