I agree that he shouldn't bring up Alabama and Richardson like he does. However, Richardon being in a different class has nothing to do with him being a Jr. vs Ware being a sophomore.
No *****. But it's disrespectful to Ware to have Danielson say this two weeks in a row. Ware is killing it out there, and I'm sick of hearing "not in the same class" nonsense. That's the point.
I disagree. I'll tell ya what we don't want. We don't want is the analyst doing our game disrespecting our starting RB by saying he's not even in the same class as our rival school's RB. No one is denying TR's talent. He's a beast and we'll definitely have our hands full with him. He's probably a better over all back then SW. But saying SW is not even in the same class as him? That's garbage..
Interesting perspective... I actually gained a measure of respect for him that I didn't have before, after watching that.
what i am saying is he is comparing them at two different stages in their careers. lets compare next years numbers for ware to this years for richardson. comparing them to equal points in their careers. to me, that is a better method of comparing numbers because the experience and maturity is equal. that said, i dont think ware is as inferior to richardson as danielson implies. is richardson better, yes, but not light years as suggested.
Hawthorne gets some names wrong (Alley Landry) and Miles eats the field. That's why I love them both.
