I’m more and more convinced we’re blaming the wrong man in a sense. The one constant throughout all our losses and failures is that for the most part our o line has underperformed. Theyv been gashed and pushed around. Our d lines haven’t been dominant either. Both are not strong enough to dominate. I think the strength program needs fixing. This isn’t to let Les or O or E off the hook but if you can’t win a one on one match you can’t be a top tier team.
With you about next year but I really don't care about big stats I want more wins. However I believe E's offense will put up better numbers next year if we get Davis and Emery. We will have 2 experienced QB's, WR will be better and a better deeper OL.
Winston makes a bunch of sense. Everything starts with the OL and the QB. If either one is subpar stats will suck.
I would really love for someone to teach burrow how to react while being pressured. That is his weakness, he usually makes good choices however when he is pressured he holds the ball to long or takes unnecessary sacks.
@Winston1 I said the same thing after the Bama game. They've been consistently dominating us in the trenches for the last 4 years. http://www.tigerfan.com/threads/lack-of-talent-is-a-myth.149199/page-6#post-1739876
That's an agreement the SEC and Big 12 have exclusively with the Sugar Bowl. That was a Bowlsby and Slive deal made with the SB committee. It coincides with the playoff rotation. It guarantees both conferences they'll have the Sugar each year outside of that rotation. We're saying the same thing...two different aspects of who is there. It's a contract bowl based on...