FBI executes search warrant at Mar-a-Lago

What righteousness do you speak of? I have no idea what you're talking about. martin rarely curses anyone, so if it happened, its out of character.

Good, you're the only 2 opposing viewpoints on the board and I enjoy the banter.

Answer the question honestly, admit that you were wrong, if you can, and he won't have to paint you into a corner to get it.

 

why would it be russians? where is the evidence for that?

and from the start you said the laptop was a russian disinfo campaign, you didnt specify anything from it which you think is fake. and i asked you maybe 2 dozen times. i asked if the photos were fake, and thats not really hunter? does he not really smoke crack and bang whores?

what part is it that you have evidence for supporting russians were involved even the tiniest bit?

keep in mind we are maybe nearing 40 times i have asked.

do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?

do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?

do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?


do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?



do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?


do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?


do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?do you have any evidence whatsoever of russian involvement? why do you keep saying russians?

 

the reason i ask is because i see this is as a huge failure of our media and goct, and a frightening squelching of free speech by social media.

there was never any indication of russians at all. and yet we were squelched on social media. banned from discussing it. banned from linking the new york post. told by a fuckload of former high level govt officials a total lie. and the media fell in line with those govt folks. the govt is supposed to challenge the govt, not fall in line.

again, all of the russian shit, from the start was false, a dangerous lie pushed by the media, invented by hillary with assistance from corporate media.

so thats why i keep asking. why did you believe that shit without evidence? why did you spread lies? i want you to think about how all off this works, hoe the media lied to you, how they shut down a story and painted a massive lie that lasted for years. every single night MSNBC said everythginwas russia this and russian that.


trump is a clown. a liar, a self-involved clown. he has nothing, not a thing to do with russia. thats all false.

hillary knew the russia stuff was bad for a candidate, so she invented it.


pay attention here:


"Three days before Trump’s presidential announcement, Hillary Clinton entered the race, and it was she, not Trump, who began her campaign facing scrutiny over Russia ties. Weeks earlier, the Times had collaborated with the conservative author of a best-selling book to explore various Clinton-Russia links, including a lucrative speech in Moscow by Bill Clinton, Russia-related donations to the Clinton family foundation, and Russia-friendly initiatives by the Obama administration while Hillary was secretary of state. The Times itself said it had an “exclusive agreement” with the author to “pursue the story lines found in the book” through “its own reporting.” An internal Clinton campaign poll, shared within the campaign the day of Trump’s announcement, showed that the Russia entanglements exposed in the book and the Times were the most worrisome “Clinton negative message,” according to campaign records. Robert Trout, Clinton’s campaign lawyer, declined to comment on the record after an exchange of emails.

By 2016, as Trump’s political viability grew and he voiced admiration for Russia’s “strong leader,” Clinton and her campaign would secretly sponsor and publicly promote an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that there was a secret alliance between Trump and Russia. The media would eventually play a role in all that"


- Pulitzer prize winning former NY times writer, in the colombia journalism review.

read this. twice. dont be a fucking idiot.

https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-1.php


thats what the fuck happened. why not just accept it and give up on the TDS?

 

i dont recall doing that but if i do, i apologize. i should be civil. now be a bro and stop deflecting by accusing people of being angry. nobody is angry. they never are. its just a gay ass deflection. its widespread on the internet. every argument some dumb fuck starts saying "lol" out of nowhere (implying the other person is laughably wrong without explaining why) and calling everyone else angry. its a deflection. try not to do it please.

 

the question at hand is important. where is the evidence the russians had anything to do with t he biden laptop?


given that you can never produce anything, why was this ever a story? why was the claim about russians made? who is behind it? for what reason?

the media has been failing us at hitorical rates lately

1. played along with russian lie
2. hugely fucked up whole epidemic/vax shit
3. is massively pro war
4. wont report on nazis in ukraine, which i know very well from visinting ukraine
5. wont report that we or our allies blew up nord pipe, which is very very dangerous
6, lab leak lies and made up asian hate crime wave

so thats why i keep on about the russia lie. its par of dangerous pattern i have never seen before. collusion between media, public health authories, hillary, DNC, big pharma, war machine etc

 

Yes, it certainly does.

But 174 pages in some highjackers have attempted to distract from the matter at hand with, predictably, "Hunter's laptop!", "Hunter's laptop!", "Hunter's laptop!", "Hunter's laptop!".

They can't defend the illegal scumminess of taking home nuclear secrets, secrets that would kill Americans and harm our national defense, to have them strewn haphazardly where many internationals could see... and probably did. We have already seen that trump shared secret military maps with Kid Rock, of all people, which leads to the very justifiable presumption that he shared such things with other people.

We KNOW that trumpians shared disinformation about the contents of Hunter's laptop; the recent plea proves that. The only thing about Hunter's laptop going forward that I would really like to know: why did the Saudis pay Jared Kushner TWO BILLION DOLLARS? But that's a discussion for another thread.

 

I have no opposition to admit I was wrong….see my thread after the 2016 election.

Until he can tell me where all the lies about the Biden laptop came from, I’m not going to admit anything because frankly no one has been able to answer my question about where the lies came from. He thinks he is right but he cannot answer my one simple question: where did all those salacious stories come from about the laptop? They obviously weren’t true or we’d have a much different outcome to this investigation. For five years all we’ve heard is that there was corruption at the highest levels, bribery, money laundering….even human trafficking. And the “evidence” for all of this was the laptop. Now we know it was all a lie. So….either all of those lies were indeed Russian disinformation and I have been right all along, or they were Republican lies and JMG has been right.

 

I accept your apology. I’ll stay away from calling you angry if you stay away from saying “fuck you.” I have no animosity here; it’s an anonymous chat forum.

 

I just did a search. I can’t find the last time JMG told you “fuck you”

 

Just answered you in the Trump is in Trouble thread.