FBI executes search warrant at Mar-a-Lago

Not what he said in real time.

 

what does that mean?

so we are willing to concede now he said that he condemns the white supremacists at Charlottesville, and now your contention is that the timing of it at the press conference means its not true? what particular window of time would you find acceptable? can he say both there are good people on both sides, but not the white supremacists, and its not valid because he didnt say two things at the exact same time. must he record himself condemning them and play that over himself?

like if i say i like corn, but not on the cob, is it too late, i already said i like corn and must like all of it and all caveats are invalid for not being made in "real time"?

 

trump did in fact clarify he didnt mean the white supremacists, didnt he?

""“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.” - trump

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/

the very fine people trump means are those there saying its ok to have a historical statue. i know this becuase he said it directly:

"but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue"

so again, trump tells you explicitly who the fine folks are, and explicitly tells you he condemns the white supremacists. there is no lack of clarity whatsoever. you simply will lie about this forever, it appears. and you will try to get me off track with deflections. not gonna happen.

 

And you drank the kook aid. Hell, you mixed it too.

 

deflection doesnt work on me, try to understand that.

trump did in fact clarify he didnt mean the white supremacists, didnt he?

""“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.” - trump

 

That was a statement from real time. Shall I post the video so you can watch?

 

That is exactly what he said, in Real Time! CNN et al cut the audio to make you believe what they wanted you to believe and it worked.

 

deflect much?

 

TDS fascinates me. there are central tenets, gospel, that cannot be given up. that trump said white supremacists were fine people is directly provable as a lie, and yet people cling to it. the media told them its true.

the issue here isnt what trump said and what he meant, we know that. my point here is to show how far these liberals will go with their lies. very far. i have posted maybe 20 posts with direct evidence that @rockwallfan, and @Winston1 are lying but they wont give in yet.

you may think it futile, that i cannot convince them. but i can. like @Rex implied that trump said that virus is a hoax, which is of course a lie, he didnt say that. so after maybe 30 posts, i pushed him to admit it was not true. it can be done.

the lying left will try to deflect, over and over, change the topic, insult you with hopes that will distract, anything to avoid the truth, but with perseverance, sometimes you can make them honest. but you might have to repeat the same fact 30-100 times.

@rockwallfan when trup said there were fine people at charlottesville, he meant people who care about statues, and he said so at the time. a reporter pretended he meant white supremacists, but he shut that down:

"“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.” - trump

is this clarification something you can accept or will you deflect 10 more times?

 

It is fascinating. It's like they’ve been hypnotized. After you show them direct evidence repeatedly i can picture @Winston1 @rockwallfan becoming seriously disturbed, twitching uncontrollably, drooling, shouting "racist, Jan 6, liar, racist..."

One guess is that they had subliminal brainwashing messages embedded in the Jan 6 TV coverage. Or some new fancy super high tech brain washing technology. Did you watch? I didn't. I'm curious if they have the same goto news channel. Something is going on beyond a completely biased media. I hope serious research is happening.