We play in a 2RB and 2WR league with a TE and one Flex. I"ll only play Powell on a bye week. My WR are J. Landry, Keenan Allen and I have Kendall Wright on the bench. Thanks for the advice though.
I play in a league just like that. You will play bench players on a bye week, injury week, and/or one of your guys loses there job for whatever reason. Stack up...Powell is droppable if there are others with a better situation out there for your bench. No problem...I will shut up if you want me to.
No. It's ok. I have Rothlisberger too. That hurt. So I picked up Blake Bortles. Trust me, I'm trying to stack up. If I have them then the other's don't.
The only QB who has been scoring who was left in FA in one of my leagues was Andy Dalton so I picked him up because the guy playing me this week has Big Ben as his QB. I got him so the other guy couldn't, have no intention of playing him.
Andy Dalton's hair is so red that nobody gives him any credit. I have Brees as my #1 and Dalton as my backup. With Brees out last week, I noticed that Fitzpatrick (free agent) had a higher forecast than Dalton last week so I picked up and started Fitzpatrick. Fortunately, that error didn't cost me. Think I'll start giving Dalton more of a chance going forward.
Anyone picking up Vick just in case? I'd be curious to see the number of lefty QBs that have started an NFL game by decade since the 70s. Seems to be decreasing.
Yep, I picked up TTaylor, KWilliams, and ABlue. Shoulda picked up DFreeman last week. I let my son pick up Freeman this week and ADalton. He's kicking my butt anyway.
We also get points for receptions/carries and yardage. 4 touches = 1 point. And we get a 3 pt bonus for going over 100 rushing/receiving and 3 pt bonus for a QB going over 350 yards passing. Another 3 points for going over 150 or 425 passing. 120 points is a fair score for a week. 90 is really low. 150 is hard to beat.
Anybody play on FanDuel or DraftKings? Haralabos Voulgaris, also known as Bob Voulgaris or H-Bob on Bill Simmons' podcasts, is a professional sports gambler, and has been called "the world's top NBA gambler." Voulgaris has made a name for himself identifying patterns, locating edges, and developing models and algorithms to beat the sportsbooks. According to ESPN, he had accumulated "a fortune" before turning 30, and routinely bet $1 million on NBA games in a single day. Voulgaris was a guest on ESPN Radio's "The Dan Le Batard Show" on Wednesday to talk about the scandal that has hit the daily-fantasy-sports industry. In this recent controversy, The New York Times reported that one employee for DraftKings was shown to have access to valuable data the same week he won $350,000 at rival site FanDuel, raising questions about who had access to what data. According to Voulgaris, this is not really a big advantage as the data can be found by regular players if they do the right research, at least for NFL games. "The advantage that he had is not even really that big of an advantage in the NFL," Voulgaris told the show. "The information he was using is basically publicly available on a Thursday. So basically, if you enter a bunch of contests on a Thursday, you can see the ownership of all of the players that you selected and that's representative of that Thursday for the following Sunday's NFL." In other words, a player can see the ownership data on Thursday and the patterns will likely still be the same on Sunday. Voulgaris does explain that this type of data would have a bigger advantage in MLB daily-fantasy-sports games since the games are played and completed in a single day instead of over a five-day window. But this doesn't mean the average player isn't getting screwed. In fact, Voulgaris says the casual player sitting at home and watching NFL games for fun is getting "fleeced." "The real issue is, that I think people don't realize, is the fact that the person who is tuning in and seeing these commercials, and signing up to play in these multi-tournaments, where the winner gets a million dollars, I think if they knew that they were going to enter maybe three, or four, or five entries, but a pro is going to enter 1,000 entries, they wouldn't think it was that exciting to enter these contests. I think that's the part where there is some impropriety. If the actual casual viewer, watching these commercials and signing up, knew they weren't competing against other like-minded people like themselves, that they're competing against professionals who have algorithms and thousands and thousands of entries in all these tournaments, they would realize that their chances of winning are really not that good and it's really not as exciting as they think it is ... the pros are winning all the money and they are also entering all the contests. It's a giant partnership between the pros and the sites, and the unsuspecting customers who are doing this for entertainment are literally getting fleeced." What Voulgaris is describing is not unlike playing poker, something else he has excelled at. Playing regular fantasy sports, at sites like ESPN.com, is like playing poker with your friends for a few bucks. Playing daily fantasy sports is like going to Vegas and sitting down at a poker table, where two or three of the other players are secretly pros, and thinking the game is going to be just like the one played in your coworker's basement. It's not, and it won't be, and you are probably going to get fleeced. You can listen to the entire segment at ESPN.com. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/millionaire-sports-gambler-explains-why-180100740.html
