Yep. Easily. If Ridley doesn't fumble after the onside kick, we kneel twice, masturbate, then congratulate John Chavis, who dialed up a great blitz call to get the ball back and save our ass. Instead, we give up 60 more passing yards and nearly lose. Turnovers are always the key. Luckily it's correctable. Ball security was one of the pillars of the 2007 team. Miles may never be able to control our penalties (maddening I know, but hard to stop with such sh*t officials trying to govern high caliber athletes), but he's always been good at limiting fumbles until Saturday. Ridley won't get many more chances to cough it up, I know that much. Especially not with future stars like Ford, Ware, Blue and Gore waiting in the wings.
But you cant take away the 50 yard run, its Sheppard’s style. On the other hand Ridley is the back that is fine with 3-5 yards a carry b/c he is the one who will have to pound his way through the rough chit.. In my perfect drives, we should be 2-3 yards out on 2nd down or at least 2 yards out on 3rd. Even if the other team knows we are running, LSU has to be able to dominate the line for that play, simple. I said awhile back, the most important trait that this O can have is running the plays THEY want to run and Executing them,. IMO, Sheppard should be used just like he was in the 1st half… The coaches just need to do it in the 2nd half also. I like Ridley, but IMO he should not start the next game as punishment for the fumbles.. He should have learned from scott..
[/QUOTE] This, the BC powder for the damn strong headache and someone else's Les Fudd crack are the reasons I keep coming back. When the day is long and crappy, I can always count on a good laugh.
false. false. Now I see why teachers have an impossible task in the public school system. I have to start charging for this.
I remember the waterboy picked up the ball and tossed to the ref after it rolled out of bounds. Please mark him down for a touch.
i don't get the TOP thing..if you can score in a couple plays do it..the score is what matters..not how long you had the ball..I understand that the d gets tired...If they are changing the game plan that put up 30pts in the first half to say that we had the ball longer that is stupid...
I agree with all of this actually. My point was to show that we shouldn't wait for the rest of the offense to be more efficient in order to give Shepard more touches. Without Shepard, our running game wasn't producing. We haven't shown we can rull the ball down our opponents' throats. Almost all of our points came on big plays, not sustained drives. We should let our playmakers make plays.
When you guys lose a game, I'm telling the ole lady---- DON'T LOOK ETHEL !!!! let the mooning and flashing begin...
Which is it? Should we let our playmakers make plays or sustain drives? The two can be mutually exclusive.
