So your official position is that this team of "investigators" were able to find out all about this but the FBI couldn't? Interesting. And you can stop quoting the article. I read the article and, trust me, it's not worth repeating.
And you offer nothing to make a point. I'm done with you. I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. Farewell friend. Source isn't CNN so you cant even objectively make an argument to counter what was posted.
Nah just tired of his crap. He talks a lot of shit, hardly ever offers anything of substance. Well, unless CNN tells him too. Dont worry, I aint leaving the board like his BFF. I just wont respond to him.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-10/why-some-u-s-ex-spies-don-t-buy-the-russia-story Add Bloomberg to the list. Terrible source, right?
Pretty interesting information in this and not to be dismissed lightly. As you all know I've been on the Trump team for colluding. I still am troubled by their contacts and affinity with Putin, other Russian agents before during and after the election. However that doesn't preclude this being the actual narrative of how the leaks came out. As the author writes I hope this is followed up by serious investigation. If the "hack" was an inside job there is much more to learn about what was gong on at the DNC and the HRC campaign. If true it won't be pretty.
My Indian buddy in Oklahoma would call NC "heap big smoke no fire" my Texas buddies would label NC "all hat no cattle". Or if you want to use a movie line he's a "neo maxi zoom dweebie".
