Because Paul is so self-immolating that he entertains the idea that the Bush administration may have somehow been responsible for 9/11 in order to pander to the kook brigade known as the 9/11 Truthers; because he regurgitates and then spews old Soviet agitprop verbatim that vilifies and demonizes America as being an evil and greedy imperialist capitalist country that exploits smaller countries; because like a self-loathing loon he always blames America first; because he is an anti-Semitic bigot and racist; and because he maligns and denigrates corporatism as evil incarnate because like a paranoid schizophrenic he suspiciously claims they somehow control us at the same time that he also disparages global bankers as plunderers of men and wealth. Indeed, he is a nihilist who hates any and all American interventions at the same time he also vilifies and demonizes the vaunted Military-Industrial Complex. As a matter of fact, Paul is so paranoid and sees so many imaginary evil demons it isn’t funny, as his entire worldview is nothing but one big and gigantic conspiracy theory. It’s the same kind of ideological machinations that drives the left and I oppose him because the consequences of what he promotes barely differs from those of the Leftist agenda. With respect to Hannity, I already explained it.
Nothing you have said is true and merely your own kooky opinion. PROVE it. Or SHUT it. Again I ask for FACTS not just hot air from your mouth.
Don't encourage him. This is the kind of guy who goes from board to board just trying to be inflammatory. He's only interested in hearing himself talk and any contrary opinions are ridiculed and insulted to distract attention from his amazing shallowness. It's very effective in the schoolyard. When he pisses everyone off here and stops getting responses, he'll find a new playground.
The people that claim Paul is part of the truthers is just absurd. Paul claims, and based on the 9/11 commission report and other CIA reports, that part of the 9/11 attack was caused by blowback from our own foreign policy. Which if you deny that you are a kook.
He's exactly right. The part where we failed to respond immediately and forcefully when attacked (USS Cole, first WTC bombing, nightclub bombings, etc.)
The key issue that seperates Paul from the others is his opposition to the Federal Reserve. On this issue he overlaps a bit with what "truthers" suggest (regarding the Fed) although I don't think he has the same opinions as they do regarding 9/11. It is also the reason Ron Paul will never be allowed to rise to the top by the powers that be in the Republican party. Nobody seriously opposed to the Fed will ever win a national election....there is too much money in support of the Fed.
Those interested in running should just watch Bill Maher and do the complete opposite. They would be right 99% of the time and the country would be in good shape. :thumb:
