Oh, the typical Red55 response. We offer objection to government interferences, Red55 responds that we have nothing and that his opinion, oddly aligned with the government, is fact.
I'm trying to get you to clarify a confusing statement. Nonsense. You stated that "the government is not the end-all-be all" and I asked what your point was, since no one had suggested that and it didn't seem to have any bearing on what we were discussing . . . which was another confusing statement of yours. I stated that governments set standards, to which you replied "So your opinion is not your own?" What is that supposed to mean? :huh:
And I can't legally smoke weed which is clearly a part of my religion. Damn You Gubment!!!!! :cuss::cuss::cuss::cuss:
I could see screaming about religious freedom if the church itself was required to provide birth control in it's health care, but it is NOT. Only their businesses in the public sector. And the law has been structured so that the church's money is not paying for the contraception anyway, the insurance companies are. In my opinion, the church is using a vital women's health issue to convince christians that their religious freedoms are being taken away, when they are not.
