Presented to the UN Climate Summit in Marrakech, Morocco – November 2016 Key climate data highlights: Global temperatures have been virtually flat for about 18 years, according to satellite data, and peer-reviewed literature is now scaling back predictions of future warming The U.S. has had no Category 3 or larger hurricane make landfall since 2005 – the longest spell since the Civil War. Strong F3 or larger tornadoes have been in decline since the 1970s. Despite claims of snow being ‘a thing of the past,’ cold season snowfall has been rising. Sea level rise rates have been steady for over a century, with recent deceleration. Droughts and floods are neither historically unusual nor caused by mankind, and there is no evidence we are currently having any unusual weather. So-called hottest year claims are based on year-to-year temperature data that differs by only a few HUNDREDTHS of a degree to tenths of a degree Fahrenheit – differences that are within the margin of error in the data. In other words, global temperatures have essentially held very steady with no sign of acceleration. A 2015 NASA study found Antarctica was NOT losing ice mass and ‘not currently contributing to sea level rise.’ In 2016, Arctic sea ice was 22% greater than at the recent low point of 2012. The Arctic sea ice is now in a 10-year ‘pause’ with ‘no significant change in the past decade. Polar bears are doing fine, with their numbers way up since the 1968 I've never understand why so many people could be tricked into thinking a trace level (400ppm) compound (CO2) could be the driver of any climate change. And it is even more unbelievable when considering that humans were blamed, even though humans only contribute approximately 3% to the total CO2 level. In other words, for one to believe in AGW (man-caused global warming), you must also believe that the 12ppm of CO2 that the entire population causes puts the Earth into the critical tipping point of ever increasing temperatures. Additionally, even if a radical, life altering 8% decrease in man-caused CO2 were achieved, it would only decrease CO2 levels by 1ppm. All that suffering to unsuccessfully try and get a lower temp when it's more likely anyway that a higher temperature is better for human survival and comfort. It has always been about control. Just like "Gun Control". It's about control, not guns or climate. Getting control of the means of producing power, as in oil and coal, especially oil, by legislating how and when we can produce it and then legislating how and when and how much we can consume, why then they have control over virtually all business, transportation, manufacturing and agriculture. What more could they ask for? Health care? Maybe that too. Obama just about pulled off by far the largest ponzi scheme ever. Just imagine him running the UN and the Clinton's the White House. With their direct connections to the Davos Group who make no bones about setting up an unelected "World government" to dictate laws that your own democratically elected government would have to bow to. Not only would they be able to redistrubute the American wealth, they would now have their hands on the world.
Dont know if all of it is fabricated but they at least had to guts to report the findings from their 2015 study. A 2015 NASA study found Antarctica was NOT losing ice mass and ‘not currently contributing to sea level rise. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...ns-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
Very prominent scientists are bailing out of the so-called “consensus.” Renowned Princeton Physicist Freeman Dyson: ‘I’m 100% Democrat and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on climate issue, and the Republicans took the right side’ Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Dr. Ivar Giaever, Who Endorsed Obama Now Says Prez. is ‘Ridiculous’ & ‘Dead Wrong’ on ‘Global Warming’ Green Guru James Lovelock reverses belief in ‘global warming’: Now says ‘I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy’ - Condemns green movement: 'It’s a religion really, It’s totally unscientific'
Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT and a member of the National Academy of Sciences who has long questioned climate change orthodoxy, is skeptical that a sunnier outlook is upon us. “I actually doubt that,” he said. Even if some of the roughly $2.5 billion in taxpayer dollars currently spent on climate research across 13 different federal agencies now shifts to scientists less invested in the calamitous narrative, Lindzen believes groupthink has so corrupted the field that funding should be sharply curtailed rather than redirected. “They should probably cut the funding by 80 to 90 percent until the field cleans up,” he said. “Climate science has been set back two generations, and they have destroyed its intellectual foundations.” The field is cluttered with entrenched figures who must toe the established line, he said, pointing to a recent congressional report that found the Obama administration got a top Department of Energy scientist fired and generally intimidated the staff to conform with its politicized position on climate change. “Remember this was a tiny field, a backwater, and then suddenly you increased the funding to billions and everyone got into it,” Lindzen said. “Even in 1990 no one at MIT called themselves a ‘climate scientist,’ and then all of a sudden everyone was. They only entered it because of the bucks; they realized it was a gravy train. You have to get it back to the people who only care about the science.”
OK no more links for a while its just that this whole climate change scam bugs the living shit out of me. I have studied and researched this for almost 40 years back to the time when they tried to scam us about global cooling in the 70's.
Al Gore while burning over $10K/mo. to heat and light his house/property said NYC would be under water by 2015 or some shit. Looks like that prediction was nonsense.
