Charles Scott is the man!

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by CParso, Aug 30, 2008.

  1. offshoretrash

    offshoretrash Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    601
    Likes Received:
    65
    I've been saying this all a long. I thought Scott was the best back on the team last year including Hester. I think he will get most of the carries and have a big year.
     
  2. CajunlostinCali

    CajunlostinCali Booger Eatin Moron

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,180
    Likes Received:
    8,283
    Scott was a fuggin freight train. He looked mean, aggressive, athletic, mean, aggressive, happy, like he just got laid happy. Yip...:)
     
  3. Bandit88

    Bandit88 Old Enough to Know Better

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6,068
    Likes Received:
    511
    OK. I understand your position. I still don't understand your reasoning.

    Scott looks dominant. KW looks horrible. Why do you think he'll get more carries than last year?
     
  4. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    because there is no hester?
     
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Williams does not have to be horrible for Scott to be better. He's a good back and will be used early and often this year.
     
  6. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,599
    Likes Received:
    520
    I was hoping that this would be Williams' breakout season, but it is not looking good for him. If he has not evolved by his junior year, it is questionable if he will. Scott looked really great and Ridley shows a lot of promise. I was also sorry, and a bit surprised, that Murphy did not get more touches.
     
  7. Bandit88

    Bandit88 Old Enough to Know Better

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6,068
    Likes Received:
    511
    But there is a Murphy and a Ridley and both are running harder than KW at this point. And Scott looks like Hester with maybe a bit more velocity. So, again, I don't see how anyone can at this point say that Scott won't get Hester - like numbers of carries. Based on one game, I'd say the evidence is that he IS the next Jacob Hester. But it's just one game.
     
  8. Bandit88

    Bandit88 Old Enough to Know Better

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6,068
    Likes Received:
    511
    My comment was that KW looked horrible. That observation was independent of CS.

    My sincere hope is that KW gets it figured out. But, after watching the game twice now, there is no dispute. KW just didn't look like he was all that pumped up about playing. CS, RM and SR all looked better than KW to me.

    KW has the POTENTIAL to be a good back. Yesterday, he quit running twice and cost LSU a first down on one of them.
     
  9. cajdav1

    cajdav1 Soldiers are real hero's

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,493
    Likes Received:
    1,331
    With Scott averaging 10 yards a pop it doesn't surprise me that Murphy didn't get more touches. He may be the one who gets 16 carries in the next game.
     
  10. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    It seemed Keiland got more touches than Murphy did though, which is what I don't understand.
     

Share This Page