I personally feel that any violent act that would be, say, above the authority of a governor's pardon, would suffice.
Awesome, so Alabama polices itself eh? Nice, "son, the boys in Birmingham called, seems the public is upset because you landed a perfect belly to back. I may have to have you sit, but don't worry it's not going to effect us, I've been assured of that by Birmingham, so dont worry. Now go enjoy some of those gifts the boosters have given everyone".
i thought the sec only suspends for hitting defenseless players. and "defenseless" means making a play on the ball, as in WR or PR during a catch.
Without a doubt??? I don't know...tusk has made some pretty dumb statements in the past.....not sure they were dumb...or just crimson tainted!!
I'm looking for a compliment in there, somewhere. Never mind, like looking for gold in a salt mine. Right away I'm wondering if you are considering context or just mad at me, again. The Georgia QB was NOT defenseless. No way, no how, period. Nothing too dumb about that.
Yes he should have been suspended. Eye gouging has no place in football. Now admit that Dial should be suspended also.
Thanks for pointing out the obvious Nutch. Im afraid it wont matter to the gumptards that insist on proclaiming innocense for various reasons ranging from technicalities, moral equivalence, and homerism. We are all just blinded by our unfortunate position of having not been inbred in Alabama.