If Mingo had done it he would have been flagged, possibly ejected and I would have thought 'why the hell did you do that !' If he wasnt flagged I would have thought 'why the hell did you do that. You are lucky you weren't flagged. Dont do that shit again.'
Gumps don't get it because that's not a personal foul when they do it, it's never been called on them before. Gump rules apply to their logic
What did you think of the nitwit bulldog player sticking his fingers in Milliner's face mask? Another no call. Then there was Striplin, I guess is his name, number 44, taking a back handed swing at Hayes and finally pushing him down. Why is he in the game after that load of nonsense. Georgia has always played undisciplined football. Cheap shot artist, who's coach often says he couldn't care less. Frankly me too, who cares? "Grown man football." That's a Georgia bulldog quote.
A player not in pursuit away from the action draws a flag on every level now. Make it a flatfooted qb on change of possession and you will never not see it. Not withstanding it was helmet to helmet.
The helmet to helmet hit should have drawn a flag. If that's the way the rule is written it's wide open for interpretation. How do you define who's in pursuit and where's the line for away from the action?
I believe I heard from one of the broadcasters that they checked with either a current or former SEC ref who told them tha it was emphasized to refs repeatedly to look for just this sort of thing against a quarterback after an interception. There was a ref in the picture but you couldn't see his face or where he was looking at the time of the hit.
