It was good enough to get us to a New Years day bowl game and had the refs did their job we should have been playing Texas in the Sugar Bowl. For this team with an offense that lacks depth, big time backs, has so so recievers and a subpar OL the offense was amazingly productive.
E's offense WILL be better next year as long as we keep the committed recruits for this class. Burrow will be more in tune with our offense and better timing with our recievers, Brennan hopefully bigger and more mature, the OL better and much deeper, recieveing group better and deeper and the rb's faster and better.
Everything I said is true and everything you are saying is false. You don't know much about football and especially offensive football. Wish you did but you dont. Your bulb is not even in the socket my friend.
Somewhere back in the beginning of this thread someone posted the thought "this wasn't a story." I can't speak for anyone here. But, this is one of those stories that's left me shaking my head and, well, chuckling? Liberty will not have a problem with cash flow if they can generate their alumni base for football. There is a lot of talent in that area. There may be a 'BYU'ish' fit there for ol' Hugh.
No one can handle Freeze's junk. Except Jesus. https://www.sbnation.com/college-fo...0417/hugh-freeze-hired-liberty-new-head-coach
You do seem to know a lot about predictable, stale offenses from the 60s-80s. I'll give you that. Most of us are looking for an OC that can give us a little more bit more modern approach. I don't mind being an I-formation power running team if we could only develop a QB that can consistently complete passes and balance out the offense when the running game isn't working.
