Arizona Bills Require Constitution Loyalty Oath, Pledge Of Allegiance By Public School Students

Again. Every question is a scientific one. Everything else is nonsense. That what the word nonsense is for, to describe unsupported theories.

 

You feel however your brain chemicals and electrical charges say you feel. Do you presume that you feel some sort of way based on magic or something? I am not sure what it is you believe. I don't understand the question, I do not understand what else there is other than my answer. Is this you attempt at a counterexample to my point? What part of the state of your brain is not 100 percent an issue of science and physics and chemistry?

Do you think, for example, when you drink whiskey and feel better that it was fairies or do you understand that you have altered your brain chemistry?

 

Do the chemicals in the boudin, when ingested by you, produce a an experience for you that activates the pleasure sensing part of the brain?

 

What about your answer isn't scientific and based on your observations? You are using the very scientific technique of observation to measure your current state. It's the most scientific thing possible, observation and measurement. You are reporting on a number of physical and mental factors. How could anything even be more scientific? The fact that I don't have access to the same measurements and senses that you do to report your state doesn't mean anything. I mean really wtf are u talking about

When u say you know how you feel, you are basing that on actual evidence! Evidence, evidence. It's not a philosophical theory with no evidence it's the complete opposite, you have a zillion nerves reporting to you!

when you are not feeling well, and you go to the doctor, do you think he is a magician or philosopher? do you understand why pre-med students take chemistry and are not reading camus? you realize that your doctor is literally a scientist, right?

 

Can't I?

If Kyle asks me if his town is hot and I ask him what the thermometer says, are we not investigating evidence? Or do you presume that because he has access to evidence I do not, that we are talking about "philosophy" again?

This is one of my more thorough thrashings of your dumb ideas.