Arizona Bills Require Constitution Loyalty Oath, Pledge Of Allegiance By Public School Students

Nah, I figure there is a 5% chance I convinced someone. You would be surprised, lots of people are religious purely because they ever thought about it and when I explain how idiotic is is they are like "yeah true enough what was I thinking"

 

Rex, honestly not trying to be difficult here but I've gone back and looked at our dialogue in this thread and I am not sure what you mean by the "first." I sincerely would like to respond to your comment but I want to be clear on what I am commenting on.

 

this is a poor analogy. 1 + 1= 2 because we have evidence of it. We can take one rock, set another rock beside it and then count them, which will always equal two. therefore if someone claims that it is 19 or 66 we have empirical evidence to support the argument that 1 + 1 is always 2. in this case we do not have a value to place on your theory or mine because they are both unknown so to call one side or the other stupid is indeed a matter of opinion and, as a result, is open for debate.

this post of yours proves that you are trying to make this about religion and it is not. i have been very clear, as has Red and many others, that we are not advancing the idea of the God of the Bible or any other book for that matter. I am stating that because there is no evidence one way or another, the possibility of their being a supreme force or being or whatever else is relevant. it's not like I am a lone ranger in my thinking. there are theoretical physicists, very prominent ones, who also theorize about the potential for a supreme being.

 

If there is no evidence one way or another, then what is your theory based on?

Yunno it's not a normal procedure to base a theory on absolutely no evidence whatsoever. It's a lot like my theory you that you beat your kids.

You still don't get it. I don't have a theory. Only you do. Yours is without any evidence supporting it. My only "theory" is not a theory, it's a fact. My fact is that your "theory" is not supported by any evidence whatsoever. In fact I think we agree, you just said your theory has no value, which is exactly agreement with my opinion.

 

We can't give up now we finally established common ground, that his theory was not based on anything, and is by definition, nonsense.

 

So what you are all saying is that Zeus being real is just as plausible as Jesus being real?

 

No. Jesus may have existed.

But magic Jesus, yes, that is what I am saying.

 

Again, this theory is a lot like my theory that you abuse young boys.

Not supported by any evidence, aggressively inane and pointless, but yunno, it's a "theory".

Also of note is how you ignore the other result of you googling, the wiki for scientific theory.