how many times will i need to ask in order for you to have the stones to answer? repeat: do you favor the bailouts?
the actual problem is the forced monopoly that will not allow private competition with the post office.
Just as soon as you admit that you lied and are now trying to change the subject. Now you are using mixed metaphors to mock and jeer to cover your embarrassment at being caught in another lie.
i was only wrong (and not lying) if you oppose the bailouts. i thought you didnt. i was right, wasnt i? third time, do you favor the obama/bush bailouts? i think you do, am i stupid and wrong? i can ask more times if you want to really appear even more cowardly and again avoid the question
I know that you weren't talking to me, but I will answer. You can't. They gone. The only way they'll come back is if for some reason people in India, China, Mexico, etc,. start to demand a higher salary and it suddenly become financially beneficial for businesses to bring them back. The focus needs to be on keeping the jobs that remain and developing a new industry that Americans excel at...
You lied when you said that I "favor taking billions from hardworking taxpayers to give to your special interests", which was an overt lie and nothing to do with the topic. You are a liar and a dishonest debater who tells lies and then, when confronted, tries to change the subject. Homey don't play that. For the third time, why did you lie about me? You are stupid and wrong and you lie. It only makes you more childish. Admit your lie and I'll be happy to answer the off-topic question, even though it is intended only to distract everyone from your attempts to pass off lies as truth.
It is not a lie until you actually answer.. B/C in reality, the statement was right if you do favor bailouts b/c that bailout was a "special interest."
Explain specifically how that was a lie. You do favor those things I mention. I was right. I know just the person we can ask to clear is up. You! You favor bailouts?
