ive never seen anything that said he was a good qb. I think we probably missed on him. And the 7 defensive linemen or so we added the last year or two. but its still early.
He has shown flashes. The comeback routes, the rollout throw to Dural. Here's my question, why play him if you aren't going to open the playbook for him. It was pointed out that Harris got snaps in all types of formations but Jennings was either in I or shotgun. If you are limited why even play him to begin with?
Les wanted 2.0. . He was longing for some jj. Those were the days. Girls were girls and men were men.
I think it's obvious. After the Lee debacle, Les was wary of having a freshman start before he was ready.
what sample size of stats or perception leads you to say he is still a good QB, when did he become at good QB to still be a good QB?
the defensive linemen is a symptom of early departures and youth, we have no excuse at QB. The defensive line can turn it around.
He brought us back from a huge hole against Wisconsin, lead us to victory against Arkansas when Zach Mettenberger couldn't, he has really only been terrible against MSST and NMST and he wasn't given a fraction of the opportunity with formations and the offense Brandon Harris was given.