Alabama writer states that LSU is already a national champion

Tusk, you're really going to ground your case on what Vegas MIGHT set the line at?

You have to see the flaw in this?

Okie St's case is based on facts (their wins vs the gimps' wins)
Your case is based on pure speculation.

Facts > Speculation

 

The way the system works????

The system works the way the voters want it to work.

In fact, what system?

And no, I wouldnt be crying or pleading our case.

IMHO their is only room for one SEC team in the BCS title game. Period. That should be the way the system works. You want to b!tch and cry about being that one team, its simple, WIN.

WIN when it matters. Like it did on 11-5-11, or it would have saturday had Georgia been undefeated. That folks....Is simple! Be the best in your conference, win your conference and go beat another team from another conference for the national title.

If the two best teams in the NFC are the two best teams in the NFL, they dont get a rematch in the superbowl. You have to be the best in your division, and then the best in your conference, your reward, to represent you conference against the other conference in the superbowl.

Why even have conferences?
Why even have conference championships?

Again, this has absolutely nothing to do with just Alabama, it has to do with the principal that is REALLY behind it all.

You can bet your sweet ass, if it were OU and not OKST, we would be playing OU. The same logic that applies to pre-season rankings. They dont mean anything right? BULLSH!T they dont!

They are meant to help voters get their favorite teams off to a good start. Without watching a down of football played, voters get together and rank teams....WTF!!!!

As for Bama being more derserving...based on what logic?

I can tell you that I have NOT seen enough from Alabama to sit here and tell you that they are better and more deserving than OKST.

Cant do it.

So, did either of them win their conference?
If so who?
Who has more wins over ranked foes?
Who has a tougher strength of schedule?
Is their a better SEC or Big 12 team already in the BCSNCG?

 

Bullshyt. You asked me how long I've been following college football, well how long have you been forloowing the BCS? Okie st won the computers, .950 - .930. 7 coaches voted them 4th in that poll, another one or two voted them 5th, and a bunch of jackasses in the Harris voted them 5th or 6th. Total Bullshyt. You people would be on suicide watch today if that had happened to you. One dumbass voter even voted Houston #5 in the Harris. Unbelievable. You are one lucky ****.

 

You lost the "evidence" portion of the formula so you dismiss it.

Like I said, Bama won a popularity contest for the chance to win a title it won't deserve even if they win the game.

 

No, it was merely one of many arguments I have made, will continue to make and plan on making in the near future. The BCS equation is not pure speculation.

 

The 2 biased parts that yall won are highly dependent on speculation. The unbiased computers on the other hand have Okie St #2.

 

Shut up Tusk. You'll never win this debate and you are chipping away at your goodwill.

 

No, I believe what I see. I have been known to believe in what other people see. But without a doubt, It becomes a much simpler belief system, when I can see it for myself. I included the computers in the BCS equation, but they don't see and I don't believe.

 

Oh great, now he is going Lou Holtzssthh on us.

 

Let me ask you this.

After watching LSU vs Alabama - Did you believe that LSU was the better team?