Politics Accusations Against Kavanaugh

What is too funny to be even believable is that the libs whine about Kavanaugh being partisan, take a deep breath, and then express outrage that Judge Garland was denied "the democratic" seat. Can't make that stuff up!

 

Give it up. You lost, we won. At least be a good sport about it. How do you think Kavanaugh will rule on any issue that impacts your life negatively?

 

Tell you what. When y’all stop talking about Clinton’s and Obama I won’t ever say this turd’s name again.

 

But to answer your question. Let’s say Mueller finds out that Trump colluded with Russians. I mean I know what Trump will say, Fake News, Hoax, and deny it and all repubs will believe it no question, and now he has his boy on the SC to make sure he stays President.

No one has said anything about the Trump administration demanding Facebook turn over information to them on Trump protestors. But it’s cool dude. Sleep with the devil all you want, Just make sure the devil don’t crawfish and bite you in the ass.

 

Whether Trump ever gets impeached is up to the Senate, not the Supreme Court.

 

I was talking about crimes. Fuck impeachment we know that shit will never happen as long as the republicans are holding both houses. Ideology and pushing your agenda is more important than anything to them. If they thought Bill Cosby would get their agenda passed there would be tons of dark money spent on adds defending him with bullshit information in them.

 

In sure that’s sarcasm but it’s tasteless sarcasm in this case.

 

Clintons Clintons Clintons Obama Obama Obama Clintonss Clintons Obama on top of Clintons Clintons underneath obamas ted kennedy in between Obama and michelle with Clinton watching. Its called a Democratic Orgy

 

LaSalle ... we all know everyone has bias. But there are certain aspects of this past story that do not lend themselves to a bias interpretation, but stand on their own. For example, Feinstein holding the letter till the eleventh hour. There is no bias to interpreting that, she did it, and there can only be one reason, to stall the proceedings. The leak of her name destroys this notion that DiFi was trying to protect her. If DIFI wanted to protect her, she would have handed the letter over to the committee so it could have been investigated for 2 months, confidentially. The elevator lady being an activist ... as opposed to an organic occurrence destroys credibility, Avenatti .... Mr anti Trump throwing into the ring ..... yeah nothing suspicious about that?

As far as Trump, it’s been two years. Further, the Democrats in their brazen actions have tainted their own investigation. Stroke (sp) Paige, McCabe, the whole connection of Fusion GPS and Perkins and Steel, and the Clinton Campaign .... Comey and Rosenstein signing off on FISA warrants that they knew were not credible ..... all of this reeks of under the table, partisan political dealing. Add to that the blackmail of Cohen and Manafort on unrelated crimes to “produce” the goods on Trump doesn’t smell too good either.

BUT .... hey ... if they come up with hard evidence, ... and I’m not talking about a piece of paper that you have to hold up to light just right, turned edgeways ....... I’ll be right there with you. But the Dims have sabotaged there own plan if the case is left open to weak interpretation. “This could mean” is not strong enough.

 

Well I at least applaud you for that.