I called him out for supporting a particular stance and he said he only gave a reference to the article and wasn't the author of said article. He flat out said "I'm out of here". It had to do with Leslie, of course.
Yes Red could be frustrating with his win at any cost approach to debate. However he often was challenging and could carry a good argument. I also was frustrated that he used Google like a crutch. Sometimes too much detail obscures and diverts from an argument. I also would rather depend on the knowledge you get for its own sake.
You guys act like he is dead. Jesus, any more knob slobbing and @BRETT will have to upgrade servers again so his "head" will fit in the damn room. You guys do know he is lurking, seeing just how much we miss him. FU @red55 you ol bastid. Put your big girl panties on and get ur ass back in the fight soldier. And that's an order!
Fuck him, you mean the guy that says he's "obtained maxim slack" (because he's a tit sucking govt employee who can't hack it in the private sector and sucks off all forms of tax payers dollars, just pro democrat because they are pro tit suckers) or the guy who says he'd never let "anonymous internet posters bother me", yet he tucks tail and runs for the hills when the free speech forum gets a little too hot for him and he's the first one to claim how "hot" the free speech forum can be.....he's so full of shit on so many levels, he's a typical liberal clown. Stop giving him a reach around Shane, it's disgusting.... Shockingly he's fairly spot on with his football analysis. There, that should draw him out...... Choss?
If they didn't have a couple of things here or there, I'd have no use for them at all. Nasty critters!
That's a two way street hunny....Talk about nasty critters? Y'all have some of the nastiest habits/features in the animal kingdom.....Y'all are just utility vehicles....just useful at certain times, otherwise left in the garage.
