and only creeps feel asking such an asinine question to a supreme court justice nominee is a legitimate question.
her whole line of questioning was condescending. hawley's and cruz too. and there were numerous people who knew kavenaugh who came forward with first hand knowledge about how unfit he was. not a single person that i've seen has had a complaint about Jackson as a person. and she's served in many roles as a lawyer and judge. more than most on the supreme court. if you're a defense lawyer your job is to get your client off. she's been criticized for doing that.
Seems legitimate as she didn’t know the answer. If she was ruling on woman’s issues and doesn’t know what a woman is, seems serious. Further, doesn’t she know she is a woman? Maybe she should be checked out.
define woman rockwallfan. Put you name on your definition so it is not so ambiguous. The left says it is an ambiguous term these days.
i hate the word "retard". i am sorry for using that term. i was getting back at you. i'm sure i could've/should've used a more appropriate word to describe what a low life you appear to be. obviously you' are quite comfortable with using it. that's all i have to say about that. and to you, for that matter.