6 points on 4 turnovers will not cut it.

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by tigerclawswipe, Sep 27, 2009.

  1. tigerclawswipe

    tigerclawswipe Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    29
    Don’t want to sound negative over here but these are things LSU needs to capitalize on. :geauxtige:geauxtige:geauxtige:geauxtige:geauxtige
     
  2. GB-Tigers08

    GB-Tigers08 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    3
    That is for sure!!!! Winning the turnover battle 4-0, having a defensive score and special teams score should equate to a 3 or 4 TD victory over an inferior (on paper) opponent! :huh:

    At least the turnovers prevented them from scoring on those drives.:geaux:
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644

    I guess you missed the int that went for a td.
     
  4. GregLSU

    GregLSU LSUFANS.com

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,293
    Likes Received:
    3,798
    It's not exactly like MSU sucked total balls. They might no win a lot of games this year... but their not being rediculously blown out either, the Auburn game was a route, but MSU played them pretty tight at times. Their scrappin out games... giving themselves the chance to win... but in the end on saturday our athletes won the battle.
    Which is fine by me... as long as we win.
    But we have got to capitalize on INTs and fumbles. Those are free gimme drives that need to result in points, not just eat clock time. I like ability to create turnovers with this defense, and we're not giving the ball up much on offense either... but still some issues to clean up.
     
  5. Berge

    Berge Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    218
    Let's look at these turnovers realistically. Also, LSU got 9 points.

    Turnover #1 - Peterson Pick-6

    Result - TD
    Evaluation: Efficient

    Turnover #2 - MSU has the ball at their own 34 yard line, deep pass intercepted by Hawkins at LSU 19.

    Result: LSU gains 15 yards, punts.
    Evaluation: MSU basically punted to LSU on first down. LSU was back inside their own 20, and couldn't move the ball effectively.

    Turnover #3 - The next play, Stallworth fumbles, recovered by Alem at the MSU 25.

    Result: LSU field goal after moving to the MSU 5 yard line.
    Evaluation: Questionable play calling on this drive. Shepard gains 15 yards on 2 runs, and comes out. LSU then stalls at the 5 yard line. Still, 3 points came from it.

    Turnover #4 - 4th and 5 at the LSU 38 yard line, Lee gets intercepted by Taylor at the LSU 17 yard line.

    Result - Again, LSU stalls. Gets stopped on a 3rd and 1 and punts back to State
    Evaluation - LSU LOST 20 yards in field position due to this "turrnover" instead of an incompletion and a turnover on downs. Yes, as a defender I am sure it is hard to intentionally drop an interception that gets put in your hands.



    The two turnovers that LSU forced that were on MSU's side of the field turned into points. It could have been better, but 9 points is 9 points.

    The other two turnovers could, and in my opinion, should be looked at as a starting drive instead of a turnover, and both worked out better than punts would have for State (likely).
     
  6. tigerclawswipe

    tigerclawswipe Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    29
    3 rushing first downs and 9 passing first downs aint going to cut it. These are even more imperfections that LSU needs to work on. Again I don’t want to sound negative but if LSU is going to beat teams like Bama and Florida they have to become more consistent when they have the ball. I am tired of people saying the wet ball or the rain that is bull $h!+. Mississippi had double the first downs then LSU. Their balls weren’t any dryer! Were their athletes better? Hell no. Were their fundamentals better maybe so? They ran the option better. Mississippi controlled the ball in the second half with solid elementary consistency. Why b/c they know how to run the option and Jefferson can’t.

    PS I am glad that some of you had the balls to talk about it.
     
  7. TexasTigers

    TexasTigers Are You With Me ?

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    5,919
    Likes Received:
    476
    "Don’t want to sound negative over here"

    Yes lord knows we don't have any negativity around here ;-)
     
  8. COramprat

    COramprat Simma Da Na

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Messages:
    4,834
    Likes Received:
    316
    Just wondering...did you have inside knowledge of how dry their balls were? or how wet? You seem to have the scoop and inquiring minds want to know.
     
  9. TexasTigers

    TexasTigers Are You With Me ?

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    5,919
    Likes Received:
    476
    "Just wondering...did you have inside knowledge of how dry their balls were? or how wet"

    I laughed out loud for about 10 minutes on that one....

    Lord I am crying. I guess simple things please simple minds but I cannot stop giggling....

    This should win an award for post of the year....
     
  10. bmy-

    bmy- Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,128
    Likes Received:
    103
    It's common sense.
     

Share This Page