I know. He asked if Vandy was Bama’s perm, they’re not but I thought he - and others in this thread- might be interested in taking a peek at the rotation since it’s being talked about. It’s called contributing to a conversation in a thread rather than stifling conversation- you should try it sometime. Follow along, I can’t keep having to go back and dumb down my posts so you can see the relation to the topic.
Damn. To borrow an old line from Howard Cosell calling an Ali - Frazier fight. DOWN GOES SHANE!! DOWN GOES SHANE!!
In one sentence you're complaining about LSU's record against Florida over the last decade. And, in another sentence you're pointing to the demise of the Florida program. LSU has maintained a .500 record over a Florida program because of it's demise but at the same time LSU is held back because they play a team every season that's in demise. What? You know exactly what I'm talking about here, tap. Stop trying to pretend to be obtuse. -------------------- The summation of this thread reads "LSU is successful when Bama is in its demise." But, "Alabama is successful only when UT is its demise." Don't some of you guys see what a ridiculous circle this logic leads...
Which is one of the main reasons for the SEC to go to a nine game conference schedule. Supported by...? Voted against by...?
Only successful? I never said that. I'm going to state this again, and if you don't understand what I'm getting at, then perhaps you should just move on. The current Nick Saban lead Alabama dynasty is build on the demise of the Tennessee program.
Dude, the traditional rivalries in the SEC are what made the SEC what it is today. I don't like UGA or AU, but I certainly look forward to that game every year.
