Mr. F.Lee Bailey noone called you blind, LMAO Good lord I love your passion for volatility though, just can’t teach that type of venom and hypersensitivity……love the “audacity” remark…..classic hardliner. It’s the only way you look at it, unless you are a mind reader and a lawyer now, again, blinders you have….not blind hunny. Not much…..I’ll take my military like our defensive tackles, large, mean and plenty of them. I won’t ever trust them and at the rate Obama plans to reduce our military in his second term, I’d be hesitant saying they couldn’t win. Hell yeah waiting 3 months for a routine MRI sounds amazing!!!! Can’t wait! Thanks to my non-drag ass work ethic I won’t need my government to take care of me, I’ll be out getting another job. Right to bear arms, period. Beside here, where should I go to “notice” this? BTW have you seen the movie I asked about when this thread originated?
Once again when your tired logic has failed, you try to make it all about me. martin is a poor role model, junior. Romney owned 100% of Bain Capital. Every penny of profit that went to Bain Capital went to Romney. The math is relentless. A=B, therefore A+100 = B+100.
So Bain never roled any of its profits into another deal? They kept 0 in retained earnings? They never purchased a building, or a fleat of vehicles? The fact that Romney owned Bain =/= Romney got all of Bain's profits. That is an infantile understanding of organizational structure and corporate finance.
no, but i was amazed to find that it is playing at my local theater. i thought it was some creepy low budget youtube thing made by angry teenagers.
It's well done, as I said has a PBS documentary feel to it...............go check it out and report back my little harlot.
thats ok, i dont care for pointless hack pieces. i am already not voting for obama because of his policies, i dont care about whatever else. also i probably wouldnt believe most of the allegations made in the film. or care about them.
They? You mean He? When you are the sole owner, stockholder, President and CEO of a company and you take a "draw" you are taking it from yourself. If Bain/Romney reinvested some of its profits, then those assets became assets of Romney/Bain. ALL ASSETS AND PROFITS OF BAIN ARE ASSETS OR INCOME FOR ROMNEY. A child can see it.
You have to produce some type of fact to declare victory. Bain, while owned by Romney, was not just some play thing that he could do with as he pleased. It was a separate legal entity and had to be treated as such. Using Bain's assets as personal assets would have opened Romney to much risk. It would have allowed the corporate veil to be pierced, and would have made him personally liable for anything Bain did. So one more time... do you have any proof to support your assertion that Romney took all the profits out of Bain or are you just going to continue to back peddle?
